http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53342
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53342
--- Comment #13 from Richard Biener 2013-02-05
15:33:51 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Feb 5 15:33:35 2013
New Revision: 195759
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=195759
Log:
2013-02-05 Richard Biener
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53342
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #29356|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53342
--- Comment #11 from Dominique d'Humieres
2013-02-05 13:35:51 UTC ---
After an incremental update of r195753 with the patch in comment #10, compiling
rnflow.f90 with '-O3 -ffast-math -funroll-loops' gives an executable which
segfault.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53342
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #29355|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53342
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|mat
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53342
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-01-14
16:45:11 UTC ---
Can't we then compute the final values of the bases after the peeling loop, and
add those gimplified after the peeling loop, then use them in the next loop?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53342
--- Comment #7 from Michael Matz 2013-01-14 15:55:51
UTC ---
The patch should lead to wrong code at some places (when peeling for
alignment actually does something). The problem is, you
calculate base and step before peeling and cache tha
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53342
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-01-11
11:52:59 UTC ---
Created attachment 29144
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29144
hackish attempt
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53342
--- Comment #5 from rguenther at suse dot de
2012-12-10 12:26:21 UTC ---
On Mon, 10 Dec 2012, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53342
>
> Jakub Jelinek changed:
>
>What
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53342
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53342
--- Comment #3 from Uros Bizjak 2012-11-13 18:46:13
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> Yeah.
Is there any progress on this issue?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53342
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53342
Michael Matz changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |matz at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53342
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
15 matches
Mail list logo