http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54497
Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54497
Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54497
Pat Haugen pthaugen at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #28135|0 |1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54497
David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dje at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54497
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54497
--- Comment #2 from Pat Haugen pthaugen at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-06
21:05:05 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
I suppose the loop is no longer predicted to execute enough times?
I don't think that's the issue, I'm thinking it's somewhere in
