http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54824
--- Comment #10 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-26
10:12:41 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Oct 26 10:12:35 2012
New Revision: 192841
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=192841
Log:
2012-10-26
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54824
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54824
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||matz
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54824
--- Comment #9 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-24
13:14:21 UTC ---
For example
Index: cfgexpand.c
===
--- cfgexpand.c (revision 192760)
+++
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54824
--- Comment #7 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at ucw dot cz 2012-10-16 14:21:29 UTC
---
I'll try to plug the hole somewhere. Honza, any good idea?
Hmm, adding __bulitin_noreturn call when this happens?
Sounds sloppy, too. We should ask user
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54824
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54824
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54824
--- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-11
15:37:41 UTC ---
In the second TC the user shouldn't lie to the compiler and put
__attribute__((noreturn)) to a function, that in fact returns. Without this
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54824
--- Comment #5 from Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-11
15:40:40 UTC ---
Started with http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?view=revisionrevision=185913
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54824
--- Comment #2 from Dmitry Gorbachev d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com
2012-10-10 06:13:05 UTC ---
Created attachment 28409
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28409
Testcase #2
Another testcase. Compile with `-O2
10 matches
Mail list logo