[Bug tree-optimization/54967] [4.8 Regression] ICE in check_loop_closed_ssa_use, at tree-ssa-loop-manip.c:55

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54967 --- Comment #9 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-23 09:57:40 UTC --- Author: hubicka Date: Tue Oct 23 09:57:36 2012 New Revision: 192709 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=192709 Log: PR

[Bug tree-optimization/54967] [4.8 Regression] ICE in check_loop_closed_ssa_use, at tree-ssa-loop-manip.c:55

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54967 Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug tree-optimization/54967] [4.8 Regression] ICE in check_loop_closed_ssa_use, at tree-ssa-loop-manip.c:55

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54967 --- Comment #11 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2012-10-23 21:26:13 UTC --- The test gfortran.dg/pr54967.f90 fails because SUBROUTINE calc_S_derivs() is duplicated.

[Bug tree-optimization/54967] [4.8 Regression] ICE in check_loop_closed_ssa_use, at tree-ssa-loop-manip.c:55

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54967 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC|hubicka at ucw dot cz,

[Bug tree-optimization/54967] [4.8 Regression] ICE in check_loop_closed_ssa_use, at tree-ssa-loop-manip.c:55

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54967 --- Comment #6 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at ucw dot cz 2012-10-19 09:35:37 UTC --- Looking into it. Obviously complette unroling ought not affect loop closedness :) Honza

[Bug tree-optimization/54967] [4.8 Regression] ICE in check_loop_closed_ssa_use, at tree-ssa-loop-manip.c:55

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54967 --- Comment #7 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-19 12:50:57 UTC --- OK, the problem is that unloop is shuffling a basic block out of the outer loop: DO m=1,6 after unrolling the inner loop: DO j=1,2 12

[Bug tree-optimization/54967] [4.8 Regression] ICE in check_loop_closed_ssa_use, at tree-ssa-loop-manip.c:55

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54967 --- Comment #8 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2012-10-19 22:15:09 UTC --- The test libgomp.graphite/force-parallel-6.c fails to execute with a bus error on x86_64-apple-darwin10 at revision 192538. Is it related to this

[Bug tree-optimization/54967] [4.8 Regression] ICE in check_loop_closed_ssa_use, at tree-ssa-loop-manip.c:55

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54967 Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/54967] [4.8 Regression] ICE in check_loop_closed_ssa_use, at tree-ssa-loop-manip.c:55

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54967 Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW

[Bug tree-optimization/54967] [4.8 Regression] ICE in check_loop_closed_ssa_use, at tree-ssa-loop-manip.c:55

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54967 Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/54967] [4.8 Regression] ICE in check_loop_closed_ssa_use, at tree-ssa-loop-manip.c:55

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54967 --- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2012-10-18 19:01:34 UTC --- The ICE appears at revision 192538 and requires gcc to be configured with --enable-checking=yes (default). I don't see it for gcc configured with