[Bug tree-optimization/56654] uninit warning behaves erratically (always executed block, "is" vs "may", order when walking uses)

2022-08-30 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56654 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/56654] uninit warning behaves erratically (always executed block, "is" vs "may", order when walking uses)

2022-08-30 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56654 --- Comment #6 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8a63343a744a8584a9dfcbc3817f66755baafe8a commit r13-2261-g8a63343a744a8584a9dfcbc3817f66755baafe8a Author: Richard Biener Date:

[Bug tree-optimization/56654] uninit warning behaves erratically (always executed block, "is" vs "may", order when walking uses)

2022-08-29 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56654 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug tree-optimization/56654] uninit warning behaves erratically (always executed block, "is" vs "may", order when walking uses)

2021-03-26 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56654 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic Last reconfirmed|2014-09-12

[Bug tree-optimization/56654] uninit warning behaves erratically

2014-09-12 Thread manu at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56654 Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug tree-optimization/56654] uninit warning behaves erratically

2014-09-11 Thread manu at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56654 Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||manu at gcc

[Bug tree-optimization/56654] uninit warning behaves erratically

2014-09-11 Thread manu at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56654 --- Comment #2 from Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Manuel López-Ibáñez from comment #1) But while this is not simple a is used because of if (b 40)? That seems to be the major bug here. Wow, I should not type in