http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58253
--- Comment #6 from Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke amylaar at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Martin Jambor from comment #1)
But again, I am not really sure what the semantics of alignment of
scalar PARM_DECL is.
The relevance of various type
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58253
--- Comment #2 from rguenther at suse dot de rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Thu, 28 Nov 2013, jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58253
--- Comment #1 from Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58253
--- Comment #3 from Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #2)
Isn't it easier to avoid building a type with different alignment
in the first place? Or do this adjustment in SRA where the bug
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58253
--- Comment #4 from Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #2)
Isn't it easier to avoid building a type with different alignment
in the first place? Or do this adjustment in SRA where the bug
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58253
--- Comment #5 from rguenther at suse dot de rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Fri, 29 Nov 2013, jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58253
--- Comment #3 from Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58253
--- Comment #1 from Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I do not quite understand why the port needs to look at alignments of
scalars passed by value at all but I assume there is a reason.
When it comes to the IPA-SRA created formal
