http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58640
--- Comment #15 from Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Jeffrey A. Law from comment #14)
Oleg, please open a new bug for the SH problem rather than piggy-backing on
this one as they're clearly distinct issues.
Sure. I've
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58640
--- Comment #14 from Jeffrey A. Law law at redhat dot com ---
Oleg, please open a new bug for the SH problem rather than piggy-backing on
this one as they're clearly distinct issues.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58640
--- Comment #13 from Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Jeffrey A. Law from comment #12)
Oleg, I just worked through an independent problem that I saw locally that
probably explains your SH issue as well. I expect to have a
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58640
--- Comment #12 from Jeffrey A. Law law at redhat dot com ---
Oleg, I just worked through an independent problem that I saw locally that
probably explains your SH issue as well. I expect to have a fix in the trunk
shortly. I'll let you know so
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58640
--- Comment #9 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
*** Bug 58696 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58640
--- Comment #10 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Oct 14 09:17:20 2013
New Revision: 203516
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=203516root=gccview=rev
Log:
2013-10-14 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58640
Jeffrey A. Law law at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58640
--- Comment #6 from Jeffrey A. Law law at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: law
Date: Fri Oct 11 20:31:25 2013
New Revision: 203463
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=203463root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/58640
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58640
--- Comment #8 from Zhendong Su su at cs dot ucdavis.edu ---
(In reply to Jeffrey A. Law from comment #7)
Fixed on trunk.
Verified (also against the original).
Thanks Jeff.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58640
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58640
Jeffrey A. Law law at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58640
--- Comment #3 from Jeffrey A. Law law at redhat dot com ---
May be related to trying to thread through 2 loop headers. ie,we're starting
the jump thread path outside any loops. On the jump thread path we find a loop
header, then the loop header
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58640
--- Comment #4 from Jeffrey A. Law law at redhat dot com ---
We're ending up with latches from two different loops going to the same
destination due to the jump thread path passing through multiple loops. This
ultimately causes the unroller to go
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58640
--- Comment #5 from Jeffrey A. Law law at redhat dot com ---
Fix going through bootstrap and regression testing.
14 matches
Mail list logo
