[Bug tree-optimization/60895] [4.8/4.9/4.10 Regression] error: address taken, but ADDRESSABLE bit not set

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60895 --- Comment #5 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Wed Apr 23 08:27:37 2014 New Revision: 209676 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=209676&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2014-04-23 Richard Biener PR middle-end/60895 * tree-inline.c

[Bug tree-optimization/60895] [4.8/4.9/4.10 Regression] error: address taken, but ADDRESSABLE bit not set

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60895 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Wed Apr 23 08:27:00 2014 New Revision: 209675 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=209675&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2014-04-23 Richard Biener PR middle-end/60895 * tree-inline.c

[Bug tree-optimization/60895] [4.8/4.9/4.10 Regression] error: address taken, but ADDRESSABLE bit not set

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60895 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener --- We copy TREE_ADDRESSABLE improperly in declare_return_variable with return_slot not being a decl. I have a patch.

[Bug tree-optimization/60895] [4.8/4.9/4.10 Regression] error: address taken, but ADDRESSABLE bit not set

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60895 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned a

[Bug tree-optimization/60895] [4.8/4.9/4.10 Regression] error: address taken, but ADDRESSABLE bit not set

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60895 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|