https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61056
wilco at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61056
--- Comment #5 from Oleg Endo ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs/gcc?view=revision=240568
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61056
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
See bug 32650 also.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61056
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61056
--- Comment #3 from Oleg Endo ---
Just for reference
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-04/msg00870.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61056
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61056
--- Comment #2 from Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #1)
1) your testcase uses strrchr rather than strchr
Sorry, typo/pasto. It was meant to be strchr.
2) why do you think it is desirable to
