https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64322
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64322
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2014-12-16 00:00:00 |2018-11-19
--- Comment #10 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64322
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #9
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64322
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64322
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Dec 17 09:29:12 2014
New Revision: 218812
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218812root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/64322
* tree-vrp.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64322
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
So, is this fix acceptable to the reporter? The explanation in the combiner is
that in the first testcase you have multiple uses of the load of 0x1L
constant and therefore it
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64322
--- Comment #8 from rguenther at suse dot de rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Wed, 17 Dec 2014, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64322
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64322
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64322
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
For VRP I'm thinking of (completely untested):
--- gcc/tree-vrp.c.jj2014-12-01 14:57:30.0 +0100
+++ gcc/tree-vrp.c2014-12-16 10:17:27.543111649 +0100
@@ -2434,6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64322
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #3)
For VRP I'm thinking of (completely untested):
--- gcc/tree-vrp.c.jj 2014-12-01 14:57:30.0 +0100
+++ gcc/tree-vrp.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64322
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #4)
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #3)
For VRP I'm thinking of (completely untested):
--- gcc/tree-vrp.c.jj 2014-12-01
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64322
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot
12 matches
Mail list logo
