[Bug tree-optimization/65802] [6 Regression] ICE in redirect_eh_edge_1, at tree-eh.c:2335

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65802 --- Comment #11 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: vries Date: Fri Apr 24 14:18:57 2015 New Revision: 222413 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=222413root=gccview=rev Log: Replace g++.dg/pr65802.C with gcc.dg/pr65802.c 2015-04-24 Tom

[Bug tree-optimization/65802] [6 Regression] ICE in redirect_eh_edge_1, at tree-eh.c:2335

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65802 --- Comment #9 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: vries Date: Tue Apr 21 08:43:07 2015 New Revision: 59 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=59root=gccview=rev Log: Mark ifn_va_arg with ECF_NOTHROW 2015-04-21 Tom de Vries

[Bug tree-optimization/65802] [6 Regression] ICE in redirect_eh_edge_1, at tree-eh.c:2335

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65802 vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug tree-optimization/65802] [6 Regression] ICE in redirect_eh_edge_1, at tree-eh.c:2335

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65802 --- Comment #7 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to vries from comment #6) (In reply to vries from comment #5) So the question is: should ifn_va_arg have ECF_NOTHROW? Adding ECF_NOTHROW to ifn_va_arg also fixes

[Bug tree-optimization/65802] [6 Regression] ICE in redirect_eh_edge_1, at tree-eh.c:2335

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65802 --- Comment #8 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #7) (In reply to vries from comment #6) (In reply to vries from comment #5) So the question is: should ifn_va_arg have ECF_NOTHROW? Adding

[Bug tree-optimization/65802] [6 Regression] ICE in redirect_eh_edge_1, at tree-eh.c:2335

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65802 --- Comment #6 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to vries from comment #5) So the question is: should ifn_va_arg have ECF_NOTHROW? Adding ECF_NOTHROW to ifn_va_arg also fixes the ICE. And at gimplify_va_arg_expr, the VA_ARG_EXPR tree

[Bug tree-optimization/65802] [6 Regression] ICE in redirect_eh_edge_1, at tree-eh.c:2335

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65802 vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/65802] [6 Regression] ICE in redirect_eh_edge_1, at tree-eh.c:2335

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65802 --- Comment #5 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org --- Before the patch series, at 011.cfg we had this representation: ... ;; basic block 2, loop depth 0, count 0, freq 0, maybe hot ;;prev block 0, next block 3, flags: (NEW, REACHABLE) ;;

[Bug tree-optimization/65802] [6 Regression] ICE in redirect_eh_edge_1, at tree-eh.c:2335

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65802 --- Comment #4 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org --- The assert triggering is: ... (gdb) #5 0x011325fe in redirect_eh_edge_1 (edge_in=0x764af4d0, new_bb=0x764ae4e0, change_region=true) at src/gcc/tree-eh.c:2335 2335 gcc_assert

[Bug tree-optimization/65802] [6 Regression] ICE in redirect_eh_edge_1, at tree-eh.c:2335

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65802 --- Comment #3 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org --- This patch allows the example to pass: ... diff --git a/gcc/passes.def b/gcc/passes.def index ffa63b5..041197c 100644 --- a/gcc/passes.def +++ b/gcc/passes.def @@ -344,7 +344,6 @@ along with GCC;

[Bug tree-optimization/65802] [6 Regression] ICE in redirect_eh_edge_1, at tree-eh.c:2335

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65802 Dmitry G. Dyachenko dimhen at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tom at