https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66917
--- Comment #18 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to ktkachov from comment #17)
> (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #16)
> > Created attachment 36099 [details]
> > patch
> >
> > I am testing the attached (on x86_64-linux), it
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66917
--- Comment #17 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #16)
> Created attachment 36099 [details]
> patch
>
> I am testing the attached (on x86_64-linux), it fixes the testcase with a
> cross to arm. Full te
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66917
--- Comment #16 from Richard Biener ---
Created attachment 36099
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36099&action=edit
patch
I am testing the attached (on x86_64-linux), it fixes the testcase with a cross
to arm. Full testing o
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66917
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66917
--- Comment #15 from Richard Biener ---
For both loads and stores we do
else if (DR_MISALIGNMENT (first_dr) == -1)
{
TREE_TYPE (data_ref)
= build_aligned_type (TREE_TYPE (data_r
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66917
--- Comment #14 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Thu, 30 Jul 2015, rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66917
>
> Richard Earnshaw changed:
>
>What|Removed |
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66917
Richard Earnshaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|target |tree-optimization
--- Comment #12 fro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66917
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.4
Summary|[4.9/5/6 regre
