https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70317
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70317
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Mar 21 21:03:44 2016
New Revision: 234382
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234382&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/70317
* match.pd (cmp @0 @0): Pass @0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70317
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
I'll use
typedef __typeof ((V) {} < (V) {}) T;
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70317
--- Comment #6 from Marc Glisse ---
(In reply to Marc Glisse from comment #5)
> Do double and long long always have the same size?
Ah, it doesn't matter since the result of <= is an opaque vector type and can
thus be implicitly cast even to a ve
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70317
--- Comment #5 from Marc Glisse ---
Yes, that looks good, thanks. Do double and long long always have the same size
(on platforms that support NaN)?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70317
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 38048
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38048&action=edit
gcc6-pr70317.patch
As this is a P1, if you meant something like this, I can test it tonight.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70317
--- Comment #3 from Marc Glisse ---
I'll get to it, but it may take a few days (hard to predict).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70317
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70317
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
