[Bug tree-optimization/71608] Wrong constant folding

2020-01-24 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71608 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/71608] Wrong constant folding

2017-07-10 Thread mikpelinux at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71608 --- Comment #5 from Mikael Pettersson --- This test case was fixed for gcc-7 by r242536.

[Bug tree-optimization/71608] Wrong constant folding

2016-06-21 Thread glisse at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71608 Marc Glisse changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code --- Comment #4 from Marc Glisse

[Bug tree-optimization/71608] Wrong constant folding

2016-06-21 Thread glisse at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71608 --- Comment #3 from Marc Glisse --- negate_expr_p, for MULT_EXPR, has: /* INT_MIN/n * n doesn't overflow while negating one operand it does if n is a power of two. */ if (INTEGRAL_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (t)) && ! TYPE_

[Bug tree-optimization/71608] Wrong constant folding

2016-06-21 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71608 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- Hmm. Doesnt -2 * x overflow?

[Bug tree-optimization/71608] Wrong constant folding

2016-06-21 Thread glisse at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71608 Marc Glisse changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|