[Bug tree-optimization/78024] [7 regression] test cases gfortran.dg/goacc/routine-4.f90 and also routine-5.f90 fail starting with r241296

2017-01-10 Thread tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78024 --- Comment #9 from Thomas Schwinge --- Author: tschwinge Date: Tue Jan 10 13:02:00 2017 New Revision: 244265 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244265&root=gcc&view=rev Log: [PR tree-optimization/78024] Clear basic block flags before using BB

[Bug tree-optimization/78024] [7 regression] test cases gfortran.dg/goacc/routine-4.f90 and also routine-5.f90 fail starting with r241296

2017-01-10 Thread tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78024 --- Comment #8 from Thomas Schwinge --- Author: tschwinge Date: Tue Jan 10 13:00:31 2017 New Revision: 244264 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244264&root=gcc&view=rev Log: [PR tree-optimization/78024] Clear basic block flags before using BB

[Bug tree-optimization/78024] [7 regression] test cases gfortran.dg/goacc/routine-4.f90 and also routine-5.f90 fail starting with r241296

2016-10-19 Thread tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78024 Thomas Schwinge changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/78024] [7 regression] test cases gfortran.dg/goacc/routine-4.f90 and also routine-5.f90 fail starting with r241296

2016-10-19 Thread rguenther at suse dot de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78024 --- Comment #6 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Wed, 19 Oct 2016, tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78024 > > Thomas Schwinge changed: > >What|Removed |A

[Bug tree-optimization/78024] [7 regression] test cases gfortran.dg/goacc/routine-4.f90 and also routine-5.f90 fail starting with r241296

2016-10-19 Thread tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78024 Thomas Schwinge changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch --- Comment #5 from Thomas Schwi

[Bug tree-optimization/78024] [7 regression] test cases gfortran.dg/goacc/routine-4.f90 and also routine-5.f90 fail starting with r241296

2016-10-19 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78024 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |7.0 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener

[Bug tree-optimization/78024] [7 regression] test cases gfortran.dg/goacc/routine-4.f90 and also routine-5.f90 fail starting with r241296

2016-10-19 Thread tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78024 Thomas Schwinge changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||openacc Status|NEW

[Bug tree-optimization/78024] [7 regression] test cases gfortran.dg/goacc/routine-4.f90 and also routine-5.f90 fail starting with r241296

2016-10-18 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78024 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/78024] [7 regression] test cases gfortran.dg/goacc/routine-4.f90 and also routine-5.f90 fail starting with r241296

2016-10-18 Thread seurer at linux dot vnet.ibm.com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78024 --- Comment #1 from Bill Seurer --- These also fail on x86.