[Bug tree-optimization/78496] [7 Regression] Missed opportunities for jump threading

2019-11-14 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78496 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Known to work|

[Bug tree-optimization/78496] [7 Regression] Missed opportunities for jump threading

2019-02-22 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78496 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milest

[Bug tree-optimization/78496] [7 Regression] Missed opportunities for jump threading

2018-07-26 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78496 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|8.2 |8.3 --- Comment #15 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug tree-optimization/78496] [7 Regression] Missed opportunities for jump threading

2018-05-02 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78496 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|8.0 |8.2 --- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug tree-optimization/78496] [7 Regression] Missed opportunities for jump threading

2017-12-04 Thread law at redhat dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78496 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[7/8 Regression] Missed |[7 Regression] Missed

[Bug tree-optimization/78496] [7 Regression] Missed opportunities for jump threading

2017-03-27 Thread law at redhat dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78496 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|7.0 |8.0 --- Comment #7 from Jeffrey A. Law

[Bug tree-optimization/78496] [7 Regression] Missed opportunities for jump threading

2017-03-23 Thread law at redhat dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78496 --- Comment #6 from Jeffrey A. Law --- So I've got a hack that allows me to evaluate the effect of the last example from c#5. So let's look at how the number of realized jump threads is affected by the various tweaks I'm playing with: VRP1

[Bug tree-optimization/78496] [7 Regression] Missed opportunities for jump threading

2017-03-21 Thread law at redhat dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78496 --- Comment #5 from Jeffrey A. Law --- More comments. As has been noted, this looks like a case where we need iteration to fully optimize. However, there are things we can do to improve VRP's jump threading which should have a direct positive i

[Bug tree-optimization/78496] [7 Regression] Missed opportunities for jump threading

2017-02-06 Thread law at redhat dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78496 --- Comment #4 from Jeffrey A. Law --- More thoughts on how we might approach resolving. To tackle in the backwards threader I think we need to change the model for how backwards threading works. Right now it starts walking up the use-def chain

[Bug tree-optimization/78496] [7 Regression] Missed opportunities for jump threading

2017-01-25 Thread law at redhat dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78496 --- Comment #3 from Jeffrey A. Law --- So I've been pondering this a bit more. Essentially I see two paths forward. One is to enhance the backwards threader so that it can do more general lookups/simplifications. I've cobbled together some c

[Bug tree-optimization/78496] [7 Regression] Missed opportunities for jump threading

2016-12-22 Thread law at redhat dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78496 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 Assignee|unassigned at gcc

[Bug tree-optimization/78496] [7 Regression] Missed opportunities for jump threading

2016-12-22 Thread law at redhat dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78496 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/78496] [7 Regression] Missed opportunities for jump threading

2016-11-26 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78496 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |7.0