https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78731
--- Comment #10 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Dec 14 10:35:11 2016
New Revision: 243644
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243644=gcc=rev
Log:
2016-12-14 Richard Biener
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78731
--- Comment #8 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Dec 14 10:32:56 2016
New Revision: 243642
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243642=gcc=rev
Log:
2016-12-14 Richard Biener
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78731
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78731
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Dec 14 10:31:37 2016
New Revision: 243641
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243641=gcc=rev
Log:
2016-12-14 Richard Biener
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78731
--- Comment #6 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
The patch is fine -- it can't hurt correctness and it's less invasive than
pulling out all the backedge handling like we did for later releases.
My only worry is that it's really a bandaid for code that is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78731
--- Comment #5 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Fri, 9 Dec 2016, law at redhat dot com wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78731
>
> Jeffrey A. Law changed:
>
>What|Removed |Added
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78731
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at redhat dot com
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78731
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Known to work|