[Bug tree-optimization/78969] bogus snprintf truncation warning due to missing range info

2021-12-15 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78969 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail|8.0 |10.3.0, 11.2.0, 8.3.0,

[Bug tree-optimization/78969] bogus snprintf truncation warning due to missing range info

2021-12-15 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78969 --- Comment #16 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Martin Sebor : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:639ece7abfa3688008cb791aec4c7a1a4f76e59f commit r12-6002-g639ece7abfa3688008cb791aec4c7a1a4f76e59f Author: Martin Sebor Date: Wed

[Bug tree-optimization/78969] bogus snprintf truncation warning due to missing range info

2019-02-23 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78969 --- Comment #15 from Martin Sebor --- (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #14) > Martin: Can you please take a look at the last comment? There is very little to go on in comment #13. Please provide a complete test case that reproduces the wa

[Bug tree-optimization/78969] bogus snprintf truncation warning due to missing range info

2018-11-19 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78969 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #14

[Bug tree-optimization/78969] bogus snprintf truncation warning due to missing range info

2018-11-08 Thread gcc at sheaffer dot ws
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78969 Jeremy Sheaffer changed: What|Removed |Added CC||gcc at sheaffer dot ws --- Comment #13

[Bug tree-optimization/78969] bogus snprintf truncation warning due to missing range info

2018-05-17 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78969 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added CC||aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #12

[Bug tree-optimization/78969] bogus snprintf truncation warning due to missing range info

2018-05-15 Thread john at jlindgren dot net
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78969 John Lindgren changed: What|Removed |Added CC||john at jlindgren dot net --- Comment #1

[Bug tree-optimization/78969] bogus snprintf truncation warning due to missing range info

2018-01-26 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78969 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2017-05-23 00:00:00 |2018-1-26 Known to fail|

[Bug tree-optimization/78969] bogus snprintf truncation warning due to missing range info

2017-05-31 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78969 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added CC||shane at paga dot moe --- Comment #9 from

[Bug tree-optimization/78969] bogus snprintf truncation warning due to missing range info

2017-05-24 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78969 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek --- idx_10 addition is a consequence of TODO_update_ssa in vrp1's todo_flags, triggered by jump threading creating the bb6.

[Bug tree-optimization/78969] bogus snprintf truncation warning due to missing range info

2017-05-24 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78969 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #7

[Bug tree-optimization/78969] bogus snprintf truncation warning due to missing range info

2017-05-23 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78969 --- Comment #6 from Martin Sebor --- I also found the following discussion about what looks like the same problem: https://patchwork.ffmpeg.org/patch/3630

[Bug tree-optimization/78969] bogus snprintf truncation warning due to missing range info

2017-05-23 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78969 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/78969] bogus snprintf truncation warning due to missing range info

2017-05-23 Thread slyfox at inbox dot ru
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78969 Sergei Trofimovich changed: What|Removed |Added CC||slyfox at inbox dot ru --- Comment

[Bug tree-optimization/78969] bogus snprintf truncation warning due to missing range info

2017-01-08 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78969 --- Comment #3 from Martin Sebor --- Author: msebor Date: Sun Jan 8 23:42:09 2017 New Revision: 244210 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244210&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR tree-optimization/78913 - Probably misleading error reported by -Wforma

[Bug tree-optimization/78969] bogus snprintf truncation warning due to missing range info

2017-01-02 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78969 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- I think there might be a dup of this bug already. basically VRP does a copy prop of where the assert was. get_range_info is not position sensitive so the range is gone after VRP.

[Bug tree-optimization/78969] bogus snprintf truncation warning due to missing range info

2017-01-02 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78969 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic, |