https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79321
--- Comment #7 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #6)
> I ran with =31 on aarch64 and ref was working. Maybe it is only test input
> is a problem.
I can confirm that, ref.pl is fine. It doesn't call fork (breakpoint at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79321
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski ---
I ran with =31 on aarch64 and ref was working. Maybe it is only test input is a
problem.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79321
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79321
--- Comment #4 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Wed, 1 Feb 2017, marxin at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79321
>
> Martin Liška changed:
>
>What|Removed |Added
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79321
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|NEW
Resolution|FIXED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79321
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79321
--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška ---
And running with OMP_NUM_LIMIT=1 works fine.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79321
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
