[Bug tree-optimization/80198] [8/9/10/11 Regression] does not vectorize generic inplace integer operation

2021-01-27 Thread rguenther at suse dot de via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80198 --- Comment #21 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Wed, 27 Jan 2021, rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80198 > > --- Comment #20 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org gnu.org> --- > (In reply to Ric

[Bug tree-optimization/80198] [8/9/10/11 Regression] does not vectorize generic inplace integer operation

2021-01-27 Thread rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80198 --- Comment #20 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #19) > So I think when you consider > > void __attribute__((noinline)) fun(int * a, int * b, int c) > { > int i; > for (i=0; i < 256; i++) { >

[Bug tree-optimization/80198] [8/9/10/11 Regression] does not vectorize generic inplace integer operation

2021-01-27 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80198 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org Last reco