https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80622
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80622
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80622
--- Comment #8 from Martin Jambor ---
Author: jamborm
Date: Thu May 4 16:19:20 2017
New Revision: 247604
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=247604=gcc=rev
Log:
[PR 80622] Treat const pools as initialized in SRA
2017-05-04 Martin Jambor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80622
--- Comment #7 from Martin Jambor ---
(In reply to Martin Jambor from comment #6)
> The simplest fix is the following, but I'll move the whole test a bit
> earlier in a patch to the mailing list:
Which is now posted at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80622
--- Comment #6 from Martin Jambor ---
The simplest fix is the following, but I'll move the whole test a bit
earlier in a patch to the mailing list:
diff --git a/gcc/tree-sra.c b/gcc/tree-sra.c
index 1606573aead..79ca1666c15 100644
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80622
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80622
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80622
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Yes, it is a regression in between r247445 and r247508, I strongly suspect
r247497.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80622
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
