https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80705
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80705
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #7
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80705
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Jun 7 13:07:06 2017
New Revision: 248970
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=248970&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-06-07 Richard Biener
Backport from mainline
20
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80705
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||8.0
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80705
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu May 11 14:08:07 2017
New Revision: 247906
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=247906&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-05-11 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/80705
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80705
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
Ok, SLP seems fine here, on x86_64 needs -fno-vect-cost-model to vectorize it.
LIM also looks fine on x86 (does nothing) so it must be IVOPTs messing up the
refs on ppc64le. Ah, on ppc64le:
vect_cst__43
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80705
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80705
--- Comment #1 from Pat Haugen ---
I should have noted that the dumps I was looking at were slp1 and lim4.
