[Bug tree-optimization/80776] -Wformat-overflow false positive for %d on integer bounded by __builtin_unreachable

2023-10-24 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80776 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|13.0|---

[Bug tree-optimization/80776] -Wformat-overflow false positive for %d on integer bounded by __builtin_unreachable

2023-10-24 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80776 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|FIXED |--- Status|RESOLVED

[Bug tree-optimization/80776] -Wformat-overflow false positive for %d on integer bounded by __builtin_unreachable

2023-06-20 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80776 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/80776] -Wformat-overflow false positive for %d on integer bounded by __builtin_unreachable

2023-06-20 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80776 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |13.0 --- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski

[Bug tree-optimization/80776] -Wformat-overflow false positive for %d on integer bounded by __builtin_unreachable

2020-03-04 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80776 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2017-05-16 00:00:00 |2020-3-4 See Also|

[Bug tree-optimization/80776] -Wformat-overflow false positive for %d on integer bounded by __builtin_unreachable

2017-11-28 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80776 --- Comment #6 from Richard Biener --- The original case is now fixed.

[Bug tree-optimization/80776] -Wformat-overflow false positive for %d on integer bounded by __builtin_unreachable

2017-11-28 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80776 --- Comment #5 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Tue Nov 28 14:58:11 2017 New Revision: 255201 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255201&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2017-11-28 Richard Biener PR tree-optimization/80776

[Bug tree-optimization/80776] -Wformat-overflow false positive for %d on integer bounded by __builtin_unreachable

2017-11-27 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80776 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug tree-optimization/80776] -Wformat-overflow false positive for %d on integer bounded by __builtin_unreachable

2017-11-25 Thread eggert at gnu dot org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80776 --- Comment #3 from Paul Eggert --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1) > Possibly the walk in remove_range_assertions visits the latter before the > former block but in principle we do have code to handle this there. I just ran into th

[Bug tree-optimization/80776] -Wformat-overflow false positive for %d on integer bounded by __builtin_unreachable

2017-11-21 Thread jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80776 Joseph S. Myers changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #

[Bug tree-optimization/80776] -Wformat-overflow false positive for %d on integer bounded by __builtin_unreachable

2017-05-16 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80776 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic, |