https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80894
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80894
--- Comment #8 from Marc Glisse ---
Hopefully the issue is the same as in PR 80974, which does have a testcase.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80894
--- Comment #7 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Yes, there is quite a bit of difference especially starting in the function
read_asc20hmm. There are a whole bunch of if/else ifs there using strncmp.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80894
--- Comment #6 from Thomas Koenig ---
(In reply to seurer from comment #5)
> The problem appears to be in compiling hmmio.c. If I compile everything
> else with a compiler built from r248447 and hmmio.c from a compiler built
> with r248446 then
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80894
seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80894
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
--- Comment #4 from Thomas Koeni
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80894
--- Comment #3 from Marc Glisse ---
I built the latest version of hmmer from upstream on x86_64-linux and make
check succeeded. I did it again with -O2 -ffast-math -funsigned-char in CFLAGS,
and got a single failure in sse-utest both with my patc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80894
--- Comment #2 from Marc Glisse ---
Is there a way I can reproduce that? I don't think I have access to SPEC. Would
using a regular upstream hmmer work? Is that just running make test? Or do you
have before/after dumps?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80894
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86_64-linux-gnu,
|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80894
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Status|UNCONFIRME
10 matches
Mail list logo
