https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83298
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83298
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
This goes wrong during dom2, before that we have:
[local count: 161061274]:
b.1_11 = b;
if (b.1_11 <= 0)
goto ; [85.00%]
else
goto ; [15.00%]
[local count: 136902083]:
[local count: 9
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83298
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83298
--- Comment #3 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
I see what's going on here. I'm a bit concerned there's a deeper issue. Some
planned gcc-9 work would take care of this, but I was hoping to avoid those
changes in the gcc-8 cycle. Investigating the deepe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83298
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zsojka at seznam dot cz
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83298
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||babokin at gmail dot com
--- Comment #5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83298
--- Comment #6 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Author: law
Date: Tue Dec 12 22:46:46 2017
New Revision: 255593
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255593&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/83298
PR tree-optimization/83362
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83298
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
