[Bug tree-optimization/83410] [8 regression] libgomp.graphite/force-parallel-4.c etc. FAIL

2017-12-18 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83410 --- Comment #8 from Richard Biener --- So it's SCOP detection failing in /* Check for unstructured control flow: CFG not generated by structured if-then-else. */ if (bb->succs->length () > 1) { edge e;

[Bug tree-optimization/83410] [8 regression] libgomp.graphite/force-parallel-4.c etc. FAIL

2017-12-15 Thread law at redhat dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83410 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/83410] [8 regression] libgomp.graphite/force-parallel-4.c etc. FAIL

2017-12-15 Thread law at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83410 --- Comment #6 from Jeffrey A. Law --- Author: law Date: Fri Dec 15 16:19:22 2017 New Revision: 255700 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255700&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR tree-optimization/83410 * tree-ssa-threadupdate.c (threa

[Bug tree-optimization/83410] [8 regression] libgomp.graphite/force-parallel-4.c etc. FAIL

2017-12-14 Thread law at redhat dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83410 --- Comment #5 from Jeffrey A. Law --- So to record my current thoughts. There's two competing needs here. We sometimes want to thread as the simplifications can enable vectorization. Other times we do not want to thread because threading inhi

[Bug tree-optimization/83410] [8 regression] libgomp.graphite/force-parallel-4.c etc. FAIL

2017-12-13 Thread law at redhat dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83410 --- Comment #4 from Jeffrey A. Law --- And of course there's cases where we depend on threading similar situations to enable vectorization. I loathe the idea of checking for graphite to determine whether or not to thread these edges, it feels li

[Bug tree-optimization/83410] [8 regression] libgomp.graphite/force-parallel-4.c etc. FAIL

2017-12-13 Thread law at redhat dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83410 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 --- Comment #3 from Jeffrey A. Law

[Bug tree-optimization/83410] [8 regression] libgomp.graphite/force-parallel-4.c etc. FAIL

2017-12-13 Thread law at redhat dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83410 --- Comment #2 from Jeffrey A. Law --- Not failing for me. Oh wait. This depends on graphite? I don't typically build with graphite. Let me restart...

[Bug tree-optimization/83410] [8 regression] libgomp.graphite/force-parallel-4.c etc. FAIL

2017-12-13 Thread dje at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83410 David Edelsohn changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/83410] [8 regression] libgomp.graphite/force-parallel-4.c etc. FAIL

2017-12-13 Thread ro at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83410 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |8.0