https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83518
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at redhat dot com
Target Mileston
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83518
Wilco changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83518
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83518
--- Comment #18 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Jul 23 10:00:24 2019
New Revision: 273732
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=273732&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-07-23 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/83518
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83518
Steve Ellcey changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sje at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #19 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83518
--- Comment #20 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Steve Ellcey from comment #19)
> Should this defect be reopened? One of the tests that was added is failing
> for me on aarch64.
>
> FAIL: g++.dg/tree-ssa/pr83518.C -std=gnu++98 scan-tree-d
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83518
--- Comment #21 from Steve Ellcey ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #20)
> (In reply to Steve Ellcey from comment #19)
> It should have been fixed by r273732 (checked with a cc1 cross to aarch64,
> albeit on a not clean tree...)
OK, I
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83518
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83518
Wilco changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||wilco at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #12 from Wi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83518
--- Comment #13 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Tue, 9 Jul 2019, wilco at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83518
>
> Wilco changed:
>
>What|Removed |Added
> ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83518
--- Comment #14 from Richard Biener ---
Yeah. It is
[local count: 178992762]:
arr = *.LC0;
arr[0] = 5;
vect__56.15_75 = MEM [(int *)&arr];
I'll fix that (well, I'll try).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83518
--- Comment #15 from Wilco ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #14)
> Yeah. It is
>
>[local count: 178992762]:
> arr = *.LC0;
> arr[0] = 5;
> vect__56.15_75 = MEM [(int *)&arr];
>
> I'll fix that (well, I'll try).
Right, i
12 matches
Mail list logo
