https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83543
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83543
--- Comment #9 from Martin Sebor ---
Author: msebor
Date: Tue Oct 29 16:14:18 2019
New Revision: 277576
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=277576=gcc=rev
Log:
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
PR testsuite/92144
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83543
--- Comment #8 from Martin Sebor ---
The test committed for the solution for pr83821 is disabled for all targets
except LP64 x86_64 to get around this limitation. Once this is implemented
across all targets the test should be enabled
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83543
--- Comment #7 from Martin Sebor ---
Author: msebor
Date: Tue Aug 27 23:31:44 2019
New Revision: 274976
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=274976=gcc=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/91567 - Spurious -Wformat-overflow warnings building glibc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83543
--- Comment #6 from Martin Sebor ---
(In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #5)
The cutoff between (a) and (b) also depends on whether or not a function is
being optimized for speed or for size, so at -Os, the x86_64 target also uses
(b) for
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83543
--- Comment #5 from Martin Sebor ---
(In reply to Ramana Radhakrishnan from comment #4)
Setting -march=armv7-a doesn't make a difference.
The root cause is that initializers of locally defined aggregates such as
struct { char a[N]; } S s =
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83543
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83543
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83543
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83543
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
--- Comment #1 from
10 matches
Mail list logo