[Bug tree-optimization/8361] [4.1/4.2 regression] C++ compile-time performance regression

2006-09-03 Thread steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #70 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-03 10:39 --- Based on my numbers of comment #69, I'm declaring this fixed once more. -- steven at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug tree-optimization/8361] [4.1/4.2 regression] C++ compile-time performance regression

2006-07-25 Thread steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #68 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-25 22:31 --- New timings. These were taken on the same box as those of comment #62 and comment #64 (Intel x86_64 3.20GHz, 1GB ram). Times are usr times Invokation: time g++ -S -fpermissive -Ox -m64 generate-3.4.ii GC params

[Bug tree-optimization/8361] [4.1/4.2 regression] C++ compile-time performance regression

2006-07-25 Thread steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #69 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-25 22:35 --- Re. comment #68, I should have added that all compilers were built with gcc (GCC) 4.0.2 20050901 (prerelease) (SUSE Linux) with CFLAGS=-O2 -g. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8361

[Bug tree-optimization/8361] [4.1/4.2 regression] C++ compile-time performance regression

2006-07-05 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #67 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-05 09:06 --- Does anyone have new numbers for this, Richard G.'s recent memory patches have an effect on the compile time also I noticed between 7% and 10% on at least CSiBE. --

[Bug tree-optimization/8361] [4.1/4.2 regression] C++ compile-time performance regression

2006-05-24 Thread mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #66 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-25 02:31 --- Will not be fixed in 4.1.1; adjust target milestone to 4.1.2. -- mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug tree-optimization/8361] [4.1/4.2 regression] C++ compile-time performance regression

2006-02-23 Thread mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #65 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-24 00:25 --- This issue will not be resolved in GCC 4.1.0; retargeted at GCC 4.1.1. -- mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug tree-optimization/8361] [4.1/4.2 regression] C++ compile-time performance regression

2006-02-11 Thread steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #62 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-11 15:46 --- Compile times for generate-3.4.ii All compilers bootstrapped, with checking disabled. Flags: -O2 GCC 4.0 (release branch today): real0m22.795s 0m22.727s 0m22.760s user0m22.481s 0m22.297s

Re: [Bug tree-optimization/8361] [4.1/4.2 regression] C++ compile-time performance regression

2006-02-11 Thread Daniel Berlin
Flags: -O3 GCC 4.0 (release branch today): real0m24.412s 0m25.000s 0m24.771s user0m23.921s 0m24.430s 0m24.210s sys 0m0.368s0m0.408s0m0.420s GCC 4.1 (release branch today): real0m33.260s 0m33.140s 0m33.188s user

[Bug tree-optimization/8361] [4.1/4.2 regression] C++ compile-time performance regression

2006-02-11 Thread dberlin at dberlin dot org
--- Comment #63 from dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-11 16:02 --- Subject: Re: [4.1/4.2 regression] C++ compile-time performance regression Flags: -O3 GCC 4.0 (release branch today): real0m24.412s 0m25.000s 0m24.771s user0m23.921s

[Bug tree-optimization/8361] [4.1/4.2 regression] C++ compile-time performance regression

2006-02-11 Thread steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #64 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-12 01:17 --- DONT_PROPAGATE_WITH_ANYTHING only exists on the trunk. With that flag, the timings are: Flags: -O2 GCC 4.2 (trunk today): real0m31.704s user0m31.094s sys 0m0.584s Flags: -O3 GCC 4.2 (trunk today):