https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84696
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84696
--- Comment #6 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #5)
> On Mon, 5 Mar 2018, marxin at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
>
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84696
> >
> > --- Comment #4 from Martin Liška ---
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84696
--- Comment #5 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Mon, 5 Mar 2018, marxin at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84696
>
> --- Comment #4 from Martin Liška ---
> (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #3)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84696
--- Comment #4 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #3)
> Martins testcase is fixed by the first fix for PR84670, the original
> testcase of this PR is not. Would be nice to reduce it further so it can be
> included in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84696
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||needs-reduction
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84696
--- Comment #2 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko ---
duplicate PR84670?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84696
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
