https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88044
--- Comment #17 from Christophe Lyon ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #16)
> Fixed.
I confirm the problem I mentioned in #c3 is now fixed. Thanks!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88044
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88044
--- Comment #15 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Jan 22 09:58:23 2019
New Revision: 268143
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268143=gcc=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/88044
* tree-ssa-loop-niter.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88044
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
--- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88044
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88044
--- Comment #12 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
None of those hang, either.
I also experimented with the options a bit. The as-is options affecting
optimization are: -O3 -funroll-loops -fpeel-loops -finline-functions
Change to -O1 and no
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88044
--- Comment #11 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> I tried both (1) and (2) and the test case does not hang.
Could you please try '0, 1', '1, 2', and '0, 2'?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88044
--- Comment #10 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I tried both (1) and (2) and the test case does not hang.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88044
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88044
--- Comment #8 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I looked at where the code is hanging and it looks like it is hung in a loop
where it keeps calling memcpy with an incrementing by 1 length.
I set a breakpoint at the start of memcpy to break
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88044
--- Comment #7 from samtebbs at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I can confirm this test fails on arm-none-linux-gnueabihf when invoking with
"-mcpu=cortex-a5 -mfpu=vfpv3-d16-fp16", as Christophe wrote. Please see the
attached log.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88044
samtebbs at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||samtebbs at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88044
--- Comment #5 from bin cheng ---
(In reply to seurer from comment #4)
> Any progress on this? It really slows down test runs as it hangs twice and
> has to wait for the timeout to occur to continue.
Sorry for being slow. I am still not very
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88044
--- Comment #4 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Any progress on this? It really slows down test runs as it hangs twice and has
to wait for the timeout to occur to continue.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88044
Christophe Lyon changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88044
Andreas Krebbel changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|powerpc64*-*-* |powerpc64*-*-*, s390x-*-*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88044
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88044
--- Comment #1 from bin cheng ---
(In reply to seurer from comment #0)
> After r266171 this test case is hanging on powerpc64 both be and le when
> compiled with -O3. If I run it via make check
>
> make -k check-fortran
>
18 matches
Mail list logo
