[Bug tree-optimization/89479] __restrict on a pointer ignored when disambiguating against a call

2023-07-07 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89479 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||javier.martinez.bugzilla@gm

[Bug tree-optimization/89479] __restrict on a pointer ignored when disambiguating against a call

2022-02-16 Thread marc--- via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89479 --- Comment #11 from Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1 of bug 94416) > I think there's a duplicate somewhere. We currently cannot encode "restrict" > into the "accesses" implied by a call. > > Note there's

[Bug tree-optimization/89479] __restrict on a pointer ignored when disambiguating against a call

2022-02-16 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89479 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||m...@nieper-wisskirchen.de --- Comment

[Bug tree-optimization/89479] __restrict on a pointer ignored when disambiguating against a call

2020-03-31 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89479 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug tree-optimization/89479] __restrict on a pointer ignored when a function is passed alongside it

2019-05-22 Thread egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89479 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug tree-optimization/89479] __restrict on a pointer ignored when a function is passed alongside it

2019-02-26 Thread rguenther at suse dot de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89479 --- Comment #7 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Tue, 26 Feb 2019, eyalroz at technion dot ac.il wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89479 > > --- Comment #5 from Eyal Rozenberg --- > (In reply to Richard Biener from

[Bug tree-optimization/89479] __restrict on a pointer ignored when a function is passed alongside it

2019-02-26 Thread eyalroz at technion dot ac.il
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89479 --- Comment #6 from Eyal Rozenberg --- Thanks to a friendly StackOverflow user, I should also report that (about) the same code produces the same compiler behavior disparity for proper C: https://godbolt.org/z/kVYqp8 with the slight

[Bug tree-optimization/89479] __restrict

2019-02-26 Thread eyalroz at technion dot ac.il
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89479 --- Comment #5 from Eyal Rozenberg --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #4) > exposing __restrict to the IL). Is "IL" an acronym for "Intermediate Language"? Remember many bug posters/readers are not GCC developers and don't know all

[Bug tree-optimization/89479] __restrict

2019-02-26 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89479 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/89479] __restrict

2019-02-24 Thread glisse at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89479 --- Comment #3 from Marc Glisse --- Hmm indeed they are different (it would have been clearer to omit const in the initial testcase). I couldn't find an obvious duplicate in bug 49774.

[Bug tree-optimization/89479] __restrict

2019-02-23 Thread eyalroz at technion dot ac.il
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89479 Eyal Rozenberg changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/89479] __restrict

2019-02-23 Thread glisse at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89479 Marc Glisse changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||alias, missed-optimization