https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92233
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at redhat dot com
--- Comment #3 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92233
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92233
--- Comment #1 from Marc Glisse ---
(llvm doesn't do it either)
Would some kind of threading be the most natural way to handle this? If the
compiler duplicates the code as
if (a==0) return a*b;
else if (b==0) return a*b;
then it becomes easy to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92233
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
Sev