[Bug tree-optimization/92644] [9/10 Regression] ICE in wide_int_to_tree_1, at tree.c:1530

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92644 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Nov 26 08:43:27 2019 New Revision: 278720 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=278720&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR tree-optimization/92644 * tree-ssa-phiopt.c (minmax_rep

[Bug tree-optimization/92644] [9/10 Regression] ICE in wide_int_to_tree_1, at tree.c:1530

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92644 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 47350 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47350&action=edit gcc10-pr92644.patch Untested fix.

[Bug tree-optimization/92644] [9/10 Regression] ICE in wide_int_to_tree_1, at tree.c:1530

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92644 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener --- INTEGRAL_TYPE_P

[Bug tree-optimization/92644] [9/10 Regression] ICE in wide_int_to_tree_1, at tree.c:1530

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92644 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- For pointers, it boils down whether say void * foo (void *p) { return p ? p : (void *) 1; } optimization into MAX_EXPR <1B, p> is valid or not. The original code doesn't involve any non-equality comparison

[Bug tree-optimization/92644] [9/10 Regression] ICE in wide_int_to_tree_1, at tree.c:1530

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92644 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|