[Bug tree-optimization/93258] [10 regression] Missed constant folding from constructor

2020-01-17 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93258 --- Comment #5 from Martin Liška --- Fixed on trunk with g:r10-5888-ge0804c9b5efdf17bbfb692a787df36b86f71af8d. Bisecting latest revisions e0804c9b5efdf17b(10 Jan 2020 13:47)(ja...@redhat.com): [took: 4.921s] result: OK ;; Function fn1 (_Z3fn1

[Bug tree-optimization/93258] [10 regression] Missed constant folding from constructor

2020-01-17 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93258 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/93258] [10 regression] Missed constant folding from constructor

2020-01-14 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93258 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3

[Bug tree-optimization/93258] [10 regression] Missed constant folding from constructor

2020-01-14 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93258 --- Comment #2 from Martin Liška --- > Btw, on trunk I see it optimized, maybe some recent CTOR "fixing" fixed it > again? Can you double-check? > > If it's fixed again I suggest to add the testcase (ck should be elided > in the assembly?) I c

[Bug tree-optimization/93258] [10 regression] Missed constant folding from constructor

2020-01-14 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93258 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/93258] [10 regression] Missed constant folding from constructor

2020-01-14 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93258 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization Target Milestone|