[Bug tree-optimization/95396] [8/9/10/11 Regression] GCC produces incorrect code with -O3 for loops since r8-6511-g3ae129323d150621

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95396 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug tree-optimization/95396] [8/9/10/11 Regression] GCC produces incorrect code with -O3 for loops since r8-6511-g3ae129323d150621

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95396 --- Comment #11 from Martin Liška --- (In reply to rsand...@gcc.gnu.org from comment #10) > Looks like this might have gone latent on trunk. First thought > was that it might be g:7b4ea2827d2003c8ffc76cd478f8974360cbd78f, > but it seems not.

[Bug tree-optimization/95396] [8/9/10/11 Regression] GCC produces incorrect code with -O3 for loops since r8-6511-g3ae129323d150621

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95396 --- Comment #10 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Looks like this might have gone latent on trunk. First thought was that it might be g:7b4ea2827d2003c8ffc76cd478f8974360cbd78f, but it seems not.

[Bug tree-optimization/95396] [8/9/10/11 Regression] GCC produces incorrect code with -O3 for loops since r8-6511-g3ae129323d150621

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95396 --- Comment #9 from Richard Biener --- should link all the split_constant_offset issues together ...

[Bug tree-optimization/95396] [8/9/10/11 Regression] GCC produces incorrect code with -O3 for loops since r8-6511-g3ae129323d150621

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95396 --- Comment #8 from Martin Liška --- May I please remind this issue?

[Bug tree-optimization/95396] [8/9/10/11 Regression] GCC produces incorrect code with -O3 for loops since r8-6511-g3ae129323d150621

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95396 --- Comment #7 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #6) > One odd thing is that for unsigned char _3 we get via > > wide_int var_min, var_max; > value_range_kind vr_type =

[Bug tree-optimization/95396] [8/9/10/11 Regression] GCC produces incorrect code with -O3 for loops since r8-6511-g3ae129323d150621

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95396 --- Comment #6 from Richard Biener --- One odd thing is that for unsigned char _3 we get via wide_int var_min, var_max; value_range_kind vr_type = get_range_info (tmp_var, _min,

[Bug tree-optimization/95396] [8/9/10/11 Regression] GCC produces incorrect code with -O3 for loops since r8-6511-g3ae129323d150621

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95396 --- Comment #5 from Richard Biener --- Creating dr for arr_26[_5] analyze_innermost: success. base_address: _26 offset from base address: (ssizetype) ((sizetype) (char) _3 * 2) constant offset from base address: -482

[Bug tree-optimization/95396] [8/9/10/11 Regression] GCC produces incorrect code with -O3 for loops since r8-6511-g3ae129323d150621

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95396 --- Comment #4 from Dmitry Babokin --- Richard Sandiford, could you please have a look as author of the commit, which brought the regression? We have a bunch of other fails, which might be or might be not the same as this one. We'd like to

[Bug tree-optimization/95396] [8/9/10/11 Regression] GCC produces incorrect code with -O3 for loops since r8-6511-g3ae129323d150621

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95396 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 Target Milestone|---

[Bug tree-optimization/95396] [8/9/10/11 Regression] GCC produces incorrect code with -O3 for loops since r8-6511-g3ae129323d150621

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95396 --- Comment #3 from Dmitry Babokin --- Could anyone please have a look at this bug? Fixing it would help us not to file duplicate bugs discovered in random testing.

[Bug tree-optimization/95396] [8/9/10/11 Regression] GCC produces incorrect code with -O3 for loops since r8-6511-g3ae129323d150621

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95396 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|GCC produces incorrect code |[8/9/10/11 Regression] GCC