https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95581
--- Comment #7 from Iain Sandoe ---
(In reply to Bill Seurer from comment #6)
> I tried the patch and it allowed me to build gcc on a power7 system.
but AFAIU the discussion - the builtin has the wrong signature (and needs to be
fixed)?
or did I
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95581
--- Comment #6 from Bill Seurer ---
I tried the patch and it allowed me to build gcc on a power7 system.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95581
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.0
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95581
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||seurer at linux dot
vnet.ibm.com
--- Com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95581
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||segher at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95581
--- Comment #3 from Martin Sebor ---
I posted a patch to avoid the ICE but it's not clear to me that it's the right
fix: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2020-June/547548.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95581
--- Comment #2 from Iain Sandoe ---
BTW, this is a bootstrap break for powerpc-darwin9, it fires when building
libgfortran (OK it's an 'all languages' bootstrap break).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95581
--- Comment #1 from Martin Sebor ---
gimple_call_arg(stmt, 2) asserts for this GIMPLE_CALL statement:
vect__5.6_24 = __builtin_altivec_mask_for_load (vectp_a.5_8);
The call is made with just one argument but the type of the function is
actual
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95581
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
