http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54973
--- Comment #17 from Andrew Pinski 2012-10-27
00:57:11 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #15)
> The text is now a bit more reddish. Fixed!
Thanks that is much better and thanks again for adding this text.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54973
--- Comment #16 from Ian Lance Taylor 2012-10-27 00:55:14
UTC ---
Thanks!
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54973
Frédéric Buclin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54973
--- Comment #14 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-10-26
16:52:40 UTC ---
That looks great to me (I was just being lazy reusing the existing FIELDSET
style)
Thanks for doing this!
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54973
--- Comment #13 from Andrew Pinski 2012-10-26
16:48:05 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #12)
> Click the URL link above to see how it looks like. The change has already been
> applied to GCC Bugzilla.
Is there any way to make the text red r
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54973
Frédéric Buclin changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54973
Frédéric Buclin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54973
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ian at airs dot com
--- Comm
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54973
Frédéric Buclin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54973
--- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski 2012-10-26
15:25:30 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> This is why we need it:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/2012-10/msg02459.html
I agree we need it but I don't think the above one is a good example
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54973
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-10-26
15:20:54 UTC ---
This is why we need it:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/2012-10/msg02459.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54973
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-10-23
10:28:43 UTC ---
Well the only global maintainer who commented was in favour of it, so let's try
the change.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54973
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-10-18
13:48:34 UTC ---
I'm certainly not able to approve the change, it'll need some kind of
agreement from the lead maintainers, which is why I raised it on the mailing
list. I don't know if anyo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54973
--- Comment #4 from Frédéric Buclin 2012-10-18
13:37:50 UTC ---
If everybody is happy with this mockup, I can push it live later today. Does it
need any formal approval?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54973
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-10-18
13:26:49 UTC ---
Here's a rubbishy mock up misusing and an existing CSS class, but it
makes it much easier to notice
http://www.kayari.plus.com/gcc/enter_bug.cgi-1.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54973
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-10-18
13:00:34 UTC ---
I was assuming it would be visible to everyone because it's harmless and can be
ignored (I'm sure many users will still ignore it!) but if other privileged
users don't want to
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54973
--- Comment #1 from Frédéric Buclin 2012-10-18
12:51:28 UTC ---
If you attach a mockup, I can easily write the corresponding code.
This new big notice should only be visible to users with no privileges, right?
I guess that all users with editbu
17 matches
Mail list logo
