--- Comment #14 from jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk 2006-12-02 14:00 ---
Are you in a position to try the patch on CP2K?
no quite so easy right now, but I'll be svn updating as soon as it is in. Looks
like tobias anyway tested it OK.
your PRs have given me something absorbing
...
--- Comment #15 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-02 17:50 ---
I don't think this is an error... you can add further compilers to the list of
'believers' xlf90 / pgf90.
There is no need to add any more compilers to the list - it's manifestly a
gfortran bug. Whilst the
--- Comment #10 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-01 13:16 ---
Created an attachment (id=12722)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12722action=view)
This patch fixes the testcase of #6 and regtests on Cygwin_NT/PIV
Joost,
I am not sure that I see how the test
--- Comment #11 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-01 17:20 ---
Created an attachment (id=12724)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12724action=view)
test case for interface bl_copy
(In reply to comment #10)
This patch fixes the testcase of #6 and regtests on
--- Comment #7 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-29 22:15 ---
Joost,
Do you happen to know at what revision things went bad?
As the likely author of the regression, I would be interested to know, so that
I can dig us out again.
Regards
Paul
--
--- Comment #8 from jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk 2006-11-29 22:26 ---
(In reply to comment #7)
Joost,
Do you happen to know at what revision things went bad?
I'm afraid I don't...
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29975
--- Comment #9 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-30 07:36 ---
(In reply to comment #7)
Do you happen to know at what revision things went bad?
The example program, I extracted (comment #6), actually crashes here with
- gfortran 4.1.2 20061115
- gcc-Version 4.2.0 20061006
-
://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html for instructions.
which is also different from the bugs mentioned in comment 2
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29975
--- Comment #6 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-28 18:04 ---
Reduced testcase:
PROGRAM fparser
IMPLICIT NONE
CHARACTER (LEN=1), DIMENSION(3:7), PARAMETER :: Ops =
(/ '+', '-', '*', '/', '^' /)
CHARACTER (LEN=3) :: F = ABC
IF (ANY(F(2:2) == Ops(5:6))) STOP
END
--- Comment #3 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-27 22:21 ---
Joost,
all_cp2k_gfortran.f90:128714: internal compiler error: in build_int_cst_wide,
at tree.c:852
Is this the same as PR29976 by any chance?
Paul
PS I should change your email address on testcases!
--
--- Comment #4 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-27 22:24
---
(In reply to comment #3)
Is this the same as PR29976 by any chance?
Hi Paul,
This PR is a metabug for CP2K issues; PR29976 is one of those (I'm in a middle
of a workshop frenzy right now, so I don't have time
--- Comment #6 from paolo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-25 10:05 ---
Subject: Bug 29179
Author: paolo
Date: Mon Sep 25 10:05:27 2006
New Revision: 117193
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=117193
Log:
2006-09-25 Paolo Carlini [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR
--- Comment #7 from paolo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-25 10:05 ---
Subject: Bug 29179
Author: paolo
Date: Mon Sep 25 10:05:43 2006
New Revision: 117194
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=117194
Log:
2006-09-25 Paolo Carlini [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR
--- Comment #8 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2006-09-25 10:07 ---
Fixed for 4.1.2.
--
pcarlini at suse dot de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
-_M_next = reinterpret_cast_Block_record*(__c);
__block = __block-_M_next;
--__block_count;
}
--
Summary: bugs in mt_allocator
Product: gcc
Version: 4.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: critical
Priority: P3
--- Comment #1 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2006-09-22 11:19 ---
The first bug simply doesn't exist given the comment at the beginning of
__pool_base. The second one is at most a documentation issue: _M_chunk_size
shall be always much bigger than _M_max_bytes, thus __block_count always
--- Comment #2 from random at adriver dot ru 2006-09-22 13:32 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
The first bug simply doesn't exist given the comment at the beginning of
__pool_base
In the beginning of __pool_base we see:
// Using short int as type for the binmap implies we are never
--- Comment #3 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2006-09-22 13:42 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
would it not be easier to do a post increment and not have a problem with
people never reading documentation? especially considering that it's so easy
to
fix?
No, for the simple reason that
--- Comment #4 from random at adriver dot ru 2006-09-22 14:40 ---
(In reply to comment #3)
No, for the simple reason that the allocator does not work is __block_count
turns out to be zero. The problem with your PR is that you are doing sort of
syntactical analysis of the code without
--- Comment #5 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2006-09-22 14:48 ---
(In reply to comment #4)
ok, perhaps this is not really a bug, however segfault is not very user
friendly. could ASSERT solve it?
No, we don't have asserts anywhere, for various reasons. Really, the
documentation must
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|critical|normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29179
Hi!
This example will demonstrate 2 problems in mt_allocator.cc:
typedef __gnu_cxx::__mt_allocchar allocator_type;
typedef __gnu_cxx::__pool_base::_Tune tune_type;
allocator_type mt_char;
tune_type t(8, 4, 8, (5 - 4 * sizeof(void*)), 4096, 10,
false);
--- Comment #13 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-14 19:14
---
(In reply to comment #9)
Note the comparisions patch because of the way gimple removes casts to void*
gets:
That gets fixed automatically by:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-06/msg00179.html
--
--- Comment #7 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-01 19:19 ---
I think that this one can be declared well and truly gone for the time
being.
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-27 09:03
---
(In reply to comment #1)
make check-gfortran RUNTESTFLAGS=-target_board=unix/-fbounds-check
With mainline today and the patch for PR 19777, the list is failure is now:
gfortran.dg/cray_pointers_2.f90
This PR is opened for tracking all bugs related to the -fbounds-check option.
--
Summary: [meta] -fbounds-check related bugs
Product: gcc
Version: 4.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: meta-bug
Severity: normal
Priority
--- Comment #1 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-24 21:51
---
With gfortran mainline 20060517 (and the patch for PR 27524), here is a list of
failures recorder when the testsuite is run with -fbounds-check (command line
is make check-gfortran
|| echo './'`kopetecontactlist.cpp
kopetecontactlist.cpp: In member function `QStringList
KopeteContactList::contactFileProtocols(const QString)':
kopetecontactlist.cpp:779: internal error: Bus error
Please submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed source if appropriate.
See
|x86_64-pc-linux-gnu |
Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2006-03-03 14:02:47
date||
Summary|Passing unions of _vector_ |[meta-bugs] couple of missed
|types and struct or array of|optimization
Hi,
The wiki page for gfortran contains poorly defined instructions for reporting
bugs (See below). I have no idea if I need to subscribe before I can send a bug
report. I cannot find a gfortran mailing list so I am sending it to gcc-bugs.
http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/GFortranBinariesWindows
Please
--- Comment #6 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-23 18:15 ---
Reopening as a new one came in.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15502
--- Comment #5 from tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-10 00:12 ---
All dependencies have been fixed. Closing. If anybody ever gets access to new
SPEC sources, they're free to open a new one.
--
tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-01 05:48 ---
(In reply to comment #3)
Well, can anybody file them? I don't have access to the SPEC suite.
Almost nobody has acess to SPEC 2k6 since it has not been released officially
yet.
--
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|SUSPENDED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|2005-01-05 19:52:01 |2006-01-01
--- Comment #2 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-01 07:03 ---
All the above are resolved on 4.2 and 4.0/4.1 will follow tomorrow. I will
merely suspend this for now; I am sure that other character related bugs will
crawl out of the woodwork!
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-05 21:53 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
Note there are still some more 2k5/6 SPEC blocking bugs which just had not
been
filed yet.
Well, can anybody file them? I don't have access to the SPEC suite.
--
tkoenig at gcc dot
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-02 21:13 ---
Note there are still some more 2k5/6 SPEC blocking bugs which just had not been
filed yet.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15502
--- Comment #6 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-28 18:19 ---
Confirmed, I am changing this into a meta-bug because there are three different
issues that this bug depends on now.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #7 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-28 18:21 ---
Oh, for PR 24575 to do anything useful in this case, we need to a tree based
combiner.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From ams at gnu dot org 2005-10-01 16:58 ---
Could someone go over these bugs and commit the pending patches?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21824
--
Bug 22368 depends on bug 23960, which changed state.
Bug 23960 Summary: [4.1 regression] ICE in compare_values in VRP
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23960
What|Old Value |New Value
--
Bug 19276 depends on bug 15326, which changed state.
Bug 15326 Summary: [4.0 only] ICE with assumed length character strings
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15326
What|Old Value |New Value
--
Bug 19276 depends on bug 22518, which changed state.
Bug 22518 Summary: [4.0 only] ICE in gfc_conv_function_call for character
function with LEN=length(arg)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22518
What|Old Value |New Value
--
Bug 19276 depends on bug 21825, which changed state.
Bug 21825 Summary: [4.0/4.1 Regression] 2D array initialization with reshape
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21825
What|Old Value |New Value
--
Bug 15502 depends on bug 12840, which changed state.
Bug 12840 Summary: Unable to find scalarization loop specifier
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12840
What|Old Value |New Value
--
Bug 19276 depends on bug 21730, which changed state.
Bug 21730 Summary: Character length incorrect.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21730
What|Old Value |New Value
--
What|Removed |Added
BugsThisDependsOn||23922
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15502
--
Bug 15502 depends on bug 23922, which changed state.
Bug 23922 Summary: ICE trying to fold_convert a REAL_TYPE to a RECORD_TYPE
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23922
What|Old Value |New Value
--
Bug 19276 depends on bug 23379, which changed state.
Bug 23379 Summary: compiler segfault with internal write
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23379
What|Old Value |New Value
--
Bug 15502 depends on bug 19358, which changed state.
Bug 19358 Summary: [gfortran] Segfault with missing upper bound
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19358
What|Old Value |New Value
--
Bug 19276 depends on bug 19269, which changed state.
Bug 19269 Summary: transpose(reshape(...)) of character array segfaults.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19269
What|Old Value |New Value
--
Bug 15502 depends on bug 21063, which changed state.
Bug 21063 Summary: ICE in gfc_conv_ss_descriptor, at fortran/trans-array.c:1224
after using maxloc function
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21063
What|Old Value |New Value
--
Bug 15502 depends on bug 12840, which changed state.
Bug 12840 Summary: Unable to find scalarization loop specifier
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12840
What|Old Value |New Value
--
Bug 19276 depends on bug 21730, which changed state.
Bug 21730 Summary: Character length incorrect.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21730
What|Old Value |New Value
--
Bug 15502 depends on bug 17917, which changed state.
Bug 17917 Summary: gfortran ICE on equivalence
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17917
What|Old Value |New Value
--
Bug 19276 depends on bug 19928, which changed state.
Bug 19928 Summary: Reference of constant derived type component causes failure
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19928
What|Old Value |New Value
--
Bug 19276 depends on bug 15326, which changed state.
Bug 15326 Summary: ICE with assumed length character strings
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15326
What|Old Value |New Value
--
Bug 19276 depends on bug 22518, which changed state.
Bug 22518 Summary: ICE in gfc_conv_function_call for character function with
LEN=length(arg)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22518
What|Old Value |New Value
--
Bug 19276 depends on bug 21825, which changed state.
Bug 21825 Summary: [4.0/4.1 Regression] 2D array initialization with reshape
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21825
What|Old Value |New Value
--
Bug 23261 depends on bug 23262, which changed state.
Bug 23262 Summary: [mingw32] rewind truncates file
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23262
What|Old Value |New Value
--
Bug 23261 depends on bug 23265, which changed state.
Bug 23265 Summary: [mingw32] Error in floating point output with BN edit
descriptor
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23265
What|Old Value |New Value
--
Bug 23261 depends on bug 23264, which changed state.
Bug 23264 Summary: [mingw32] direct access failure
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23264
What|Old Value |New Value
--
Bug 21824 depends on bug 23187, which changed state.
Bug 23187 Summary: MAXPATHLEN usage in gcc/ada/*.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23187
What|Old Value |New Value
--
Bug 21824 depends on bug 23187, which changed state.
Bug 23187 Summary: MAXPATHLEN usage in gcc/ada/*.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23187
What|Old Value |New Value
--
Bug 21824 depends on bug 23065, which changed state.
Bug 23065 Summary: MAXPATHLEN usage in fortran/{scanner,module}.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23065
What|Old Value |New Value
--
Bug 22368 depends on bug 23315, which changed state.
Bug 23315 Summary: java produces mismatch types in MODIFY_EXPR, down cast
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23315
What|Old Value |New Value
--
Bug 22368 depends on bug 23314, which changed state.
Bug 23314 Summary: java produces mismatch types in MODIFY_EXPR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23314
What|Old Value |New Value
--
What|Removed |Added
OtherBugsDependingO||23329
nThis||
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22368
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-11
17:06 ---
(In reply to comment #6)
Note I think I already fixed the DOM problem in PR 22335.
And now the java front-end bug has been fixed, maybe I should go ahead and test
a patch to remove
the hack from
--
What|Removed |Added
BugsThisDependsOn||23347
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22368
--
What|Removed |Added
BugsThisDependsOn||23314
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22368
--
What|Removed |Added
BugsThisDependsOn||23315
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22368
--
Bug 21824 depends on bug 21819, which changed state.
Bug 21819 Summary: i*86-*-gnu* not enabled in configure.ac
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21819
What|Old Value |New Value
--- Additional Comments From fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-07
13:05 ---
With recent patch that fixes a number of issues with temporary files
(http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-08/msg00399.html), and including the
bugs that are caused by the script not being perfect
: gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/inquire_2.f90
Total: 20 bugs (two testcases are not supposed to work since mingw doesn't have
a /dev/null device).
--
Summary: [meta-bug] gfortran testsuite bugs on mingw32
Product: gcc
Version: 4.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
--- Additional Comments From fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-06
18:51 ---
Created an attachment (id=9440)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9440action=view)
Script file that tries to emulate the dejagnu test framework
--
--- Additional Comments From fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-06
18:51 ---
Created an attachment (id=9441)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9441action=view)
Script that runs dejagnu_mimic for each interesting file in the testsuite.
--
--
Bug 22368 depends on bug 22526, which changed state.
Bug 22526 Summary: vectorizer produces mis-match types in conditionals
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22526
What|Old Value |New Value
--
Bug 15502 depends on bug 18108, which changed state.
Bug 18108 Summary: [gfortran] overloading does not work for functions
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18108
What|Old Value |New Value
--
What|Removed |Added
BugsThisDependsOn||23187
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21824
Greetings,
I've just compiled (succesfully) gcc-4.0.1 on my slackware box. It's a
Pentium II 266MHz, running linux-2.6.12.3, (old)gcc-3.3.4, glibc-2.3.4.
I used squashfs to hold the unpacked tarball during compilation.
../gcc-4.0.1/configure --enable-libada --enable-bootstrap=lean \
--
What|Removed |Added
BugsThisDependsOn||23166
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22368
--
Bug 22368 depends on bug 22460, which changed state.
Bug 22460 Summary: GCJ produces mis-match (non compatible) types in MODIFY_EXPR
(from byte-code)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22460
What|Old Value |New Value
--
Bug 16989 depends on bug 21720, which changed state.
Bug 21720 Summary: GCC incorrectly rounds hex floats
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21720
What|Old Value |New Value
--
Bug 16989 depends on bug 21720, which changed state.
Bug 21720 Summary: GCC incorrectly rounds hex floats
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21720
What|Old Value |New Value
--
What|Removed |Added
BugsThisDependsOn||23145
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22368
--
Bug 16989 depends on bug 21720, which changed state.
Bug 21720 Summary: GCC incorrectly rounds hex floats
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21720
What|Old Value |New Value
--
Bug 16989 depends on bug 22192, which changed state.
Bug 22192 Summary: Rejection of valid array declaration.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22192
What|Old Value |New Value
--
Bug 19794 depends on bug 19940, which changed state.
Bug 19940 Summary: Missed jump threading opportunity due to |.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19940
What|Old Value |New Value
--
What|Removed |Added
BugsThisDependsOn||23065
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21824
--
Bug 22368 depends on bug 22358, which changed state.
Bug 22358 Summary: C++ front-end produces mis-match types in MODIFY_EXPR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22358
What|Old Value |New Value
--
What|Removed |Added
BugsThisDependsOn||22518
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19276
--
What|Removed |Added
BugsThisDependsOn||22524
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22368
--
What|Removed |Added
BugsThisDependsOn||22525
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22368
--
What|Removed |Added
BugsThisDependsOn||22526
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22368
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-17
17:33 ---
Note the comparisions patch because of the way gimple removes casts to void*
gets:
int f(int *a, char*b)
{
return ((void*)a) == ((void*)b);
}
wrong.
The following is also effected:
g++.dg/abi/vbase13.C:
--
What|Removed |Added
BugsThisDependsOn||22527
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22368
--
Bug 15502 depends on bug 13257, which changed state.
Bug 13257 Summary: [4.0 only] Error instead of warning for missing comma in
format string
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13257
What|Old Value |New Value
--
Bug 22368 depends on bug 22398, which changed state.
Bug 22398 Summary: [4.1 Regression] ICE in compare_values, at tree-vrp.c:445
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22398
What|Old Value |New Value
701 - 800 of 924 matches
Mail list logo
