[Bug tree-optimization/19794] [meta-bug] Jump threading related bugs

2005-02-06 Thread kazu at cs dot umass dot edu
-- What|Removed |Added BugsThisDependsOn||17116 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19794

[Bug tree-optimization/19794] [meta-bug] Jump threading related bugs

2005-02-06 Thread kazu at cs dot umass dot edu
-- What|Removed |Added BugsThisDependsOn||18046 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19794

[Bug tree-optimization/19794] [meta-bug] Jump threading related bugs

2005-02-06 Thread kazu at cs dot umass dot edu
-- What|Removed |Added BugsThisDependsOn||18076 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19794

[Bug tree-optimization/19794] [meta-bug] Jump threading related bugs

2005-02-06 Thread kazu at cs dot umass dot edu
-- What|Removed |Added BugsThisDependsOn||18832 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19794

[Bug tree-optimization/19794] [meta-bug] Jump threading related bugs

2005-02-06 Thread kazu at cs dot umass dot edu
-- What|Removed |Added BugsThisDependsOn||19516 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19794

[Bug tree-optimization/19794] [meta-bug] Jump threading related bugs

2005-02-06 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- What|Removed |Added CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot ||org Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/19794] [meta-bug] Jump threading related bugs

2005-02-06 Thread kazu at cs dot umass dot edu
-- What|Removed |Added BugsThisDependsOn||19804 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19794

[Bug c/16989] [meta-bug] C99 conformance bugs

2005-02-02 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- Bug 16989 depends on bug 19435, which changed state. Bug 19435 Summary: spurious warnings with nested array constructors http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19435 What|Old Value |New Value

[Bug c/16989] [meta-bug] C99 conformance bugs

2005-02-02 Thread jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- What|Removed |Added BugsThisDependsOn||19771 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16989

Is this address still correct for GNU C bugs?

2005-01-27 Thread Chris Miller
Hi. Can you tell me if this is still the correct address to send bug reports for GNU C? Thanks, Chris Miller Tech Pubs LynuxWorks

Re: Is this address still correct for GNU C bugs?

2005-01-27 Thread Paolo Carlini
Can you tell me if this is still the correct address to send bug reports for GNU C? Please use Bugzilla instead: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Paolo.

[Bug fortran/15502] [meta-bug] bugs needed for SPEC CPU 2K and 2K5 and 95

2005-01-17 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- Bug 15502 depends on bug 19482, which changed state. Bug 19482 Summary: ICE in gfc_trans_scalar_assign http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19482 What|Old Value |New Value

[Bug fortran/15502] [meta-bug] bugs needed for SPEC CPU 2K and 2K5 and 95

2005-01-10 Thread steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- Bug 15502 depends on bug 19359, which changed state. Bug 19359 Summary: [gfortran] MODULE PROCEDURE interface improperly resolved http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19359 What|Old Value |New Value

[Bug fortran/19276] New: [metabug] CHARACTER related bugs in gfortran

2005-01-05 Thread tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org
Add all open bugs related to the handling of CHARACTERs here. Design work in this area should take all these bugs into account. -- Summary: [metabug] CHARACTER related bugs in gfortran Product: gcc Version: 4.0.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/19276] [metabug] CHARACTER related bugs in gfortran

2005-01-05 Thread tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-05 19:50 --- Added dependencies. -- What|Removed |Added BugsThisDependsOn|

[Bug fortran/19276] [metabug] CHARACTER related bugs in gfortran

2005-01-05 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed||1 Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00

[Bug c/16989] [meta-bug] C99 conformance bugs

2004-12-21 Thread rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- Bug 16989 depends on bug 18740, which changed state. Bug 18740 Summary: Execution-time sizeof drops side effects http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18740 What|Old Value |New Value

[Bug c/16989] [meta-bug] C99 conformance bugs

2004-12-21 Thread rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- Bug 16989 depends on bug 18740, which changed state. Bug 18740 Summary: Execution-time sizeof drops side effects http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18740 What|Old Value |New Value

[Bug web/19118] New: My Bugs preset query should include WAITING bugs

2004-12-21 Thread Thomas dot Koenig at online dot de
My Bugs preset query should include WAITING bugs. People who just check their bugs on the web are too likely to overlook these otherwise. -- Summary: My Bugs preset query should include WAITING bugs Product: gcc Version: 4.0.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug web/19118] My Bugs preset query should include WAITING bugs

2004-12-21 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-21 21:15 --- Confirmed. -- What|Removed |Added CC||dberlin

[Bug web/19118] My Bugs preset query should include WAITING bugs

2004-12-21 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-22 04:03 --- Daniel fixed it. -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW

[Bug other/18948] New: The following are the bugs which can be further enhanced to make it more user friendly.

2004-12-12 Thread mpkarthi21 at yahoo dot com
Hello, I am a die-hard Linux lover and using Red-hat Linux7.2 found following low seviarity bugs. Hello, we find the following bugs in Red-hat linux 7.2. Bug1: Title: Partion details are not preserved by the installer when Back button is pressed while installing Red-hat Linux7.2. Steps

[Bug other/18948] The following are the bugs which can be further enhanced to make it more user friendly.

2004-12-12 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-12 23:28 --- This bugzilla is not fox RedHat Linux at all but for GCC. -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/15502] [meta-bug] bugs needed for SPEC CPU 2K and 2K5 and 95

2004-11-11 Thread pbrook at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- Bug 15502 depends on bug 18218, which changed state. Bug 18218 Summary: Miscompare in sixtrack benchmark caused by loss of precision http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18218 What|Old Value |New Value

<    5   6   7   8   9   10