https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69260
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed||2016-01-13
Summary|C++14 template |C++14 template
|instantiation problem in|instantiation problem in
|GCC (up to 5.3) |GCC
Ever confirmed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69260
Bug ID: 69260
Summary: C++14 template instantiation problem in GCC (up to
5.3)
Product: gcc
Version: 5.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
--- Comment #7 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2010-09-09 09:16
---
The current ISO document, C++98 or C++03 which contains some rather small
amendments: if C++0x were different it would show only when -std=c++0x is
passed. In any case, it's unfortunate but we cannot do much ab
--- Comment #6 from stephane at magnenat dot net 2010-09-09 07:20 ---
Created an attachment (id=21747)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=21747&action=view)
Working code
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45601
--- Comment #5 from stephane at magnenat dot net 2010-09-09 07:19 ---
Thank you very much for these explanations, thanks to your pointer I managed to
make a working version, which I will attach to this bug as reference.
As a side-note, it is not easy to access C++ standard because the o
--- Comment #4 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2010-09-08 16:58
---
Actually, it seems pretty straightforward to me that S is nondeduced in the
last case: see 14.8.2.4/4, the last line.
--
paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #3 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2010-09-08 16:44
---
Please clarify: "As far as I can find on the net, it should work." No compiler
to which I have access compiles it, I tried, besides GCC, Intel, SunStudio,
Comeau, VC++8. Note I didn't really analyze the testcas
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-25 21:11 ---
This is not a bug.
THis is a dup of bug 20547.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 20547 ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #1 from etienne dot clement at autodesk dot com 2006-09-25
20:19 ---
Created an attachment (id=12325)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12325&action=view)
Program causing the problem.
1- Compile using the following command:
> g++ -v -save-temps -O3 -c bug
gt;::limit'. IMHO, there is no reason to generate such
a symbol. g++ 3.4.x do not generate one.
Thank you,
Etienne Clement
--
Summary: Template instantiation problem - Different behavior
between gcc 4.0.x and gcc 3.4.x.
Product: gcc
Immanuel Litzroth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The problem seems to be that recent gcc's dont compile the second do_call
> because they interpret 0 as being of type int.
Bad, bad GCC, how can it believe that the literal "0" is of type int! ;)
Jokes aside, previous GCC versions were buggy in this
Code that is problematic follows.
>>> snip
#include
template
inline void
do_call(int (*fn)(T),
const char* msg,
T t1)
{
int err;
if ((err = fn(t1)) < 0){
throw std::string(msg);
}
}
int
fn(int* a)
{
return (a ? 1 : -1);
}
int main(int argc ,char** argv)
{
int j
13 matches
Mail list logo
