https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79288
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Feb 15 17:09:18 2017
New Revision: 245488
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245488&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/79288
* decl.c (grokdeclarator): For static data me
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79301
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Feb 15 17:10:40 2017
New Revision: 245489
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245489&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/79301
* parser.c (cp_parser_std_attribute): Don't
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79347
--- Comment #8 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: amker
Date: Wed Feb 15 17:16:29 2017
New Revision: 245490
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245490&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/79347
* tree-vect-loop-mani
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79341
--- Comment #74 from Dominik Vogt ---
With the pending patches/fixes, the *san testsuites are clean on s390x biarch
and s390. :-)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79534
Bug ID: 79534
Summary: tree-ifcombine aarch64 regression with trunk@245151
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79347
--- Comment #9 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Pat Haugen from comment #7)
> See pr77536 for similar issue. Not sure if that should be marked as dup of
> this one or left open as a more general bug on what should be done to
> specif
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79472
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79535
Bug ID: 79535
Summary: ICE in verify_ctor_sanity, at cp/constexpr.c:2636
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79536
Bug ID: 79536
Summary: ICE in fold_binary_loc, at fold-const.c:9060
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79534
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
R245151
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79537
Bug ID: 79537
Summary: ICE in gimplify_expr, at gimplify.c:12009
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79534
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
r245151
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79301
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79288
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79528
--- Comment #2 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
On Wed, 15 Feb 2017, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> It seems besides conversion from integer to decimal{32,64} also all the
> arithmetics e.g. in real_arithmetics are performed in _Decima
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79538
Bug ID: 79538
Summary: missing -Wformat-overflow with %s and global array
arguments
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79536
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79536
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Component|c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79535
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code
Status|U
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78452
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79537
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79537
--- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek ---
Even r104500 ICEs so an ancient issue.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79114
--- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Ah yes, because throw_with_nested still depends on atomics in gcc-6-branch, and
so we need a dg-require- in the test (but only on the branch). I'll add that.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79539
Bug ID: 79539
Summary: __polynomial mode lookahead still has an
exponential behavior
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79539
Tim Shen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |timshen at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79537
--- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek ---
gimplify_expr has code to handle taking the address of a label:
11610 case LABEL_DECL:
11611 /* We get here when taking the address of a label. We mark
11612 the label as "forc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79537
--- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek ---
I wonder if something like this would be appropriate:
--- a/gcc/gimplify.c
+++ b/gcc/gimplify.c
@@ -12003,6 +12003,10 @@ gimplify_expr (tree *expr_p, gimple_seq *pre_p,
gimple_seq *post_p,
g
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79518
--- Comment #4 from Evan Nemerson ---
I agree that GCC's implementation makes more sense, but unfortunately it makes
it hard to write portable code.
I'm not suggesting the current behavior be abandoned, only that
__builtin_assume_aligned be enha
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79114
--- Comment #9 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Wed Feb 15 19:10:43 2017
New Revision: 245492
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245492&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/79114 use dg-require-atomic-builtins for new test
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79540
Bug ID: 79540
Summary: [7 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/fmt_fw_d.f90 -O0
execution test
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79540
--- Comment #1 from John David Anglin ---
Removed comment:
# ./fmt_fw_d.exe
print '(f2.1)',100.00 ! => : no digits
Program aborted. Backtrace:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79537
--- Comment #5 from Marek Polacek ---
This
void fn1 ()
{
L: goto *&&L;
}
doesn't ICE because we handle the goto here
11406 case GOTO_EXPR:
11407 /* If the target is not LABEL, then it is a computed jump
11408 an
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79541
Bug ID: 79541
Summary: lra reads uninitialized memory (with invalid input)
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79542
--- Comment #1 from Maxim Reznik ---
Created attachment 40755
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40755&action=edit
package spec
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79542
Bug ID: 79542
Summary: [7.0 regression] GNAT bug box
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: ada
Assig
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79543
Bug ID: 79543
Summary: Inappropriate "ld --version" checking
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: other
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79479
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
--- Comment #13 from Martin Sebor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32003
--- Comment #10 from Martin Sebor ---
Author: msebor
Date: Wed Feb 15 20:13:11 2017
New Revision: 245493
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245493&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-02-15 Martin Sebor
PR middle-end/32003
* doc/inv
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79363
--- Comment #4 from Martin Sebor ---
Author: msebor
Date: Wed Feb 15 20:28:32 2017
New Revision: 245494
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245494&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/79363 - ICE with NSDMI and array
gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
PR c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79464
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79464
--- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed Feb 15 20:29:08 2017
New Revision: 245495
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245495&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/79464 - ICE in IPA with omitted constructor parms
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79050
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79363
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[6/7 Regression] ICE with |[6 Regression] ICE with
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78127
Vladimir Makarov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79544
Bug ID: 79544
Summary: vec_sra (unsigned long long,foo) generating vsrd
instead of vsrad
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79544
Bill Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Version|unknown
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79544
--- Comment #1 from Bill Schmidt ---
Note that this is indeed wrong because the semantics of vec_sra are to
duplicate the sign bit even for unsigned inputs.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69564
--- Comment #29 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
So to bring this BZ back to the core questions (the scope seems to have widened
through the year since this originally reported). Namely are the use of LTO or
C++ making things slower, particularly for sci
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79345
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|c++ |tree-optimization
--- Comment #4 from Ja
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79479
--- Comment #14 from Paul Eggert ---
Thanks, please feel free to mark this as a duplicate of Bug#4210. I plan to
follow up there.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78572
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4210
--- Comment #25 from Paul Eggert ---
I'd like this bug to be changed from SUSPENDED to CONFIRMED, given that it's
continuing to be a problem (e.g., bug#79479).
Also, I'd like to suggest what I hope is a simple fix. In 2006 Joseph wrote
"skip_eval
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79545
Bug ID: 79545
Summary: gcc[5/6]: RS6000, xvcvuxdsp and xvcvsxdsp RTL defines
have wrong type
Product: gcc
Version: 6.3.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79546
Bug ID: 79546
Summary: Strange error: missed loop optimization, the loop
counter may overflow
[-Werror=unsafe-loop-optimizations]
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79545
Carl Love changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79545
Bill Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Target|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4210
--- Comment #26 from Martin Sebor ---
*** Bug 79479 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79479
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68971
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69564
--- Comment #30 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Looking at the dumps, the tests for whether or not to use the vectorized loop
are considerably more complex with LTO with memory references as well when
compared to the non-LTO version. It's almost as-if t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79546
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
>-Werror=unsafe-loop-optimizations
That is not enabled by default even with -Werror -W -Wall.
But "missed loop optimization, the loop counter may overflow" is basically
saying if i was an signed integer, th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66938
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66943
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #9
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71479
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|rejects-valid |diagnostic
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66938
--- Comment #2 from Martin Sebor ---
*** Bug 71479 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71479
--- Comment #7 from Martin Sebor ---
Wrong dupe id.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 66938 ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55004
Bug 55004 depends on bug 71457, which changed state.
Bug 71457 Summary: valid pointer plus conversion to bool rejected in constexpr
context
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71457
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71457
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71537
--- Comment #21 from Martin Sebor ---
*** Bug 71457 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68971
--- Comment #10 from Paul Eggert ---
Unfortunately, the patch for Bug#68120 does not seem to have addressed the
problem here. For example, although the following code uses the new feature
enabled by that patch:
int f (void) {
return (__bui
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71459
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55004
Bug 55004 depends on bug 71459, which changed state.
Bug 71459 Summary: ICE writing to a string-initialized local array in a
constexpr function
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71459
What|Removed |A
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79522
Jim Michaels changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
Resolution|INVALID
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68971
--- Comment #11 from Martin Sebor ---
Right. Because the call to __builtin_mul_overflow in the test case is not a
constant expression, the -Woverflow warning detects the overflow in the
multiplication subexpression that is constant. The __built
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66450
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71391
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55004
Bug 55004 depends on bug 71391, which changed state.
Bug 71391 Summary: error on aggregate initialization with side-effects in a
constexpr function
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71391
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79547
Bug ID: 79547
Summary: duplicate strlen calls with same argument not folded
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79540
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71315
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
See Also|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79547
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Most likely the alias analysis thinks s escapes such that f touches it.
Look at the alias dump and also add -vops to the dump option.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71093
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30334
Bug 30334 depends on bug 29465, which changed state.
Bug 29465 Summary: warning for overlapping memcpy()
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29465
What|Removed |Added
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29465
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35503
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79540
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40261
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2009-08-25 15:42:13 |2017-2-15
Known to fail|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79540
--- Comment #3 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
I see failure in r240386 (20160923). r239642 and 239726 were okay.
--
John David Anglin dave.ang...@bell.net
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44648
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||5.3.0, 6.3.0, 7.0
--- Comment #5 from Mar
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59220
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79548
Bug ID: 79548
Summary: missing -Wunused-variable on a typedef'd variable in a
function template
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79548
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
See Also|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68971
--- Comment #12 from Paul Eggert ---
Ah, sorry, I am using GCC 6.3.1, whereas __builtin_mul_overflow_p is a GCC
7-ism. Somehow I got it into my head that __builtin_mul_overflow(A,B,C) should
be a constant expression if A, B, are constant express
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60063
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60068
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||accepts-invalid
Status|UNCONF
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60488
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Known to fail|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58909
joel at clambassador dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
Resolu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68971
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79549
Bug ID: 79549
Summary: ICE in tsubst, at cp/pt.c:13474 with partial
specialization of auto... template parameter pack
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79550
Bug ID: 79550
Summary: ICE in tsubst, at cp/pt.c:13474 with partial
specialization of auto... template parameter pack
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
101 - 200 of 203 matches
Mail list logo
