[Bug ada/83535] New: Doesn’t respect Size for an object

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83535 Bug ID: 83535 Summary: Doesn’t respect Size for an object Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: ada

[Bug fortran/83458] F2008: inquire fails on units opened with newunit=

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83458 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug debug/83547] [8 Regression] (statement-frontiers) error: void value not ignored as it ought to be

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83547 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||rejects-valid

[Bug debug/83547] New: [8 Regression] (statement-frontiers) error: void value not ignored as it ought to be

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83547 Bug ID: 83547 Summary: [8 Regression] (statement-frontiers) error: void value not ignored as it ought to be Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/83467] [7/8 Regression] ICE: in assign_by_spills, at lra-assigns.c:1476: unable to find a register to spill with -flive-range-shrinkage -m8bit-idiv

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83467 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/81897] [6/7/8 Regression] spurious -Wmaybe-uninitialized warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81897 --- Comment #8 from Jeffrey A. Law --- This really looks like something tree-ssa-uninit.c ought to be handling too. [ Just to be clear we should fix both tree-ssa-uninit.c the cfgcleanup. ] We have a PHI with a default definition on the RHS:

[Bug tree-optimization/83438] [8 Regression] 435.gromacs miscompares

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83438 --- Comment #9 from Jeffrey A. Law --- My bisections keep landing on: commit bb173647d8221f86812f4e98942960b894e9e972 (HEAD, refs/bisect/bad) Author: hubicka Date: Thu Nov 23 15:56:28 2017 +

[Bug c/83539] New: [8 regression] several test case failures starting with r255947

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83539 Bug ID: 83539 Summary: [8 regression] several test case failures starting with r255947 Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug rtl-optimization/80747] [6/7/8 Regression] gcc.dg/tree-ssa/tailrecursion-4.c fails with ICE when compiled with options "-fprofile-use -freorder-blocks-and-partition"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80747 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug rtl-optimization/83513] [8 Regression] ICE: qsort checking failed (error: qsort comparator non-negative on sorted output: 3) in fill_vec_av_set in selective scheduler

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83513 --- Comment #3 from Alexander Monakov --- > (btw it appears that either the comment or the sense of the last tiebreaker > is inverted) I have to take that back, I was confused by the unusual tmp vs. tmp2 order: sel_rank_for_schedule (const

[Bug target/82092] gcc fails to link genmodes on darwin (cfiStartsArray[i] != cfiStartsArray[i-1])

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82092 --- Comment #7 from Jürgen Reuter --- I can confirm that the patch above indeed does work. Interestingly, I don't see the bootstrap on all combinations of Apple Hardware and MAC OS X versions. Apparently, the problem (for me) only shows up on an

[Bug c++/82872] [6/7/8 Regression] ICE in ignore_overflows on __PTRDIFF_MAX__ index

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82872 --- Comment #3 from Eric Botcazou --- Author: ebotcazou Date: Thu Dec 21 16:22:04 2017 New Revision: 255944 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255944=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/82872 * convert.c (convert_to_integer_1) : Do not return

[Bug c++/55004] [meta-bug] constexpr issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55004 Bug 55004 depends on bug 82872, which changed state. Bug 82872 Summary: [6/7 regression] ICE in ignore_overflows on __PTRDIFF_MAX__ index https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82872 What|Removed |Added

[Bug c++/82872] [6/7 regression] ICE in ignore_overflows on __PTRDIFF_MAX__ index

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82872 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug lto/81968] [8 regression] early lto debug objects make Solaris ld SEGV

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81968 --- Comment #33 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On December 21, 2017 4:20:35 PM GMT+01:00, "ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE" wrote: >https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81968 > >--- Comment #32 from ro at

[Bug rtl-optimization/80747] [6/7/8 Regression] gcc.dg/tree-ssa/tailrecursion-4.c fails with ICE when compiled with options "-fprofile-use -freorder-blocks-and-partition"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80747 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||asolokha at gmx dot com --- Comment #7

[Bug rtl-optimization/83512] ICE: in df_compact_blocks, at df-core.c:1729 with -freorder-blocks-algorithm=simple

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83512 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/83488] [8 Regression] ICE on a CET test-case

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83488 --- Comment #21 from igor.v.tsimbalist at intel dot com --- Maybe I did more than expected :). Actually 512VNNI has VL bit according to recently published extension. Please see

[Bug middle-end/81914] [7 Regression] gcc 7.1 generates branch for code which was branchless in earlier gcc version

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81914 --- Comment #12 from Daniel Fruzynski --- One more test case. Code compiled with TEST defined is branchless, without it has branch. [code] #include #define TEST void test(uint64_t* a) { uint64_t n = *a /

[Bug target/83536] New: One 'false' too much in r255699 for mingw target (in config/i386/i386.c)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83536 Bug ID: 83536 Summary: One 'false' too much in r255699 for mingw target (in config/i386/i386.c) Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug lto/81968] [8 regression] early lto debug objects make Solaris ld SEGV

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81968 --- Comment #32 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE --- Here are the additional types of failures found on Solaris/x86: * Invalid sh_info: FAIL: g++.dg/lto/pr42987 cp_lto_pr42987_0.o-cp_lto_pr42987_1.o link, -flto -flto-partition=none -g

[Bug fortran/83436] Internal file cannot be accessed by UNFORMATTED data transfer when reading from /dev/urandom

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83436 --- Comment #17 from Thomas Koenig --- The fix will be in gcc 7.3 which is planned for release during the third week of January according to https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2017-12/msg00102.html .

[Bug target/83488] [8 Regression] ICE on a CET test-case

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83488 --- Comment #22 from Jakub Jelinek --- Ah, that changes the situation, I guess your patch is fine then (but please ask still Uros or Kirill for approval on gcc-patches). But make sure that the i386-builtins.def | OPTION_MASK_ISA_AVX512VL

[Bug c/39170] provide an option to silence -Wconversion warnings for bit-fields

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39170 Florin Iucha changed: What|Removed |Added CC||florin.iucha at amd dot com --- Comment

[Bug target/83488] [8 Regression] ICE on a CET test-case

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83488 --- Comment #23 from Jakub Jelinek --- (In reply to igor.v.tsimbalist from comment #21) > Maybe I did more than expected :). Actually 512VNNI has VL bit according to > recently published extension. Please see > >

[Bug target/83488] [8 Regression] ICE on a CET test-case

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83488 --- Comment #24 from igor.v.tsimbalist at intel dot com --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #23) > (In reply to igor.v.tsimbalist from comment #21) > > Maybe I did more than expected :). Actually 512VNNI has VL bit according to > >

[Bug tree-optimization/83523] [8 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed (error: statement marked for throw, but doesn't)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83523 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug rtl-optimization/83367] static global constructors stack memory corruption

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83367 --- Comment #6 from Martin Liška --- (In reply to Dale Weiler from comment #5) > Except they are referenced via their this pointer (which should alias the > static storage in that translation unit). I don't see how this is any > different than

[Bug middle-end/83487] [8 Regression] ICE in expand_call, at calls.c:4098

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83487 --- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek --- Perhaps: --- gcc/config/i386/i386.c.jj 2017-12-21 09:44:34.0 +0100 +++ gcc/config/i386/i386.c 2017-12-21 13:04:03.172252517 +0100 @@ -8973,6 +8973,8 @@ ix86_function_arg_boundary

[Bug debug/83419] [8 Regression] -fcompare-debug failure (length)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83419 Alexandre Oliva changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug debug/83419] [8 Regression] -fcompare-debug failure (length)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83419 --- Comment #7 from Alexandre Oliva --- Author: aoliva Date: Thu Dec 21 18:14:06 2017 New Revision: 255947 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255947=gcc=rev Log: [SFN] propagate single-nondebug-stmt's side effects to enclosing list

[Bug debug/83527] [8 Regression] Another statement-frontiers -fcompare-debug failure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83527 Alexandre Oliva changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug c/83537] New: missing integer overflow in offsetof not diagnosed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83537 Bug ID: 83537 Summary: missing integer overflow in offsetof not diagnosed Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug libstdc++/83538] New: std::match_results C++14 conformance issue: reference != value_type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83538 Bug ID: 83538 Summary: std::match_results C++14 conformance issue: reference != value_type& Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/83536] One 'false' too much in r255699 for mingw target (in config/i386/i386.c)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83536 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug lto/82027] [7/8 Regression] wrong code with -O3 -flto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82027 --- Comment #11 from Domani Hannes --- (In reply to Martin Jambor from comment #10) > OK, so I did not realize that duplicate_thunk_for_node does not set > clone_of but former_clone of, which is of course what it must do. I > have checked and

[Bug c/83448] [7/8 Regression] ice in get_source_location_for_substring, at input.c:1507

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83448 --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek --- Untested fix: --- gimple-ssa-sprintf.c.jj82017-12-19 22:05:44.0 +0100 +++ gimple-ssa-sprintf.c2017-12-21 18:04:30.960153926 +0100 @@ -2466,7 +2466,8 @@ maybe_warn (substring_loc , locat

[Bug ada/83535] Doesn’t respect Size for an object

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83535 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/83406] [8 Regression] GCC8 can't deduce lambda return type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83406 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug debug/48150] [6/7/8 Regression] gcc.dg/guality/sra-1.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48150 Aldy Hernandez changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING CC|

[Bug c/83448] [7/8 Regression] ice in get_source_location_for_substring, at input.c:1507

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83448 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug lto/81968] [8 regression] early lto debug objects make Solaris ld SEGV

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81968 --- Comment #34 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On December 21, 2017 3:30:45 PM GMT+01:00, "ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE" wrote: >https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81968 > >--- Comment #31 from ro at

[Bug target/82092] gcc fails to link genmodes on darwin (cfiStartsArray[i] != cfiStartsArray[i-1])

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82092 --- Comment #8 from Jürgen Reuter --- Another thing I observed: one difference between the laptop where the bootstrap worked and the one where it didn't work (besides the different chipsets i5 vs. i7) is that on the one where the bootstrap

[Bug c/83448] [7/8 Regression] ice in get_source_location_for_substring, at input.c:1507

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83448 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #8

[Bug c/30552] gcc crashes when compiling examples with GNU statement expressions in VLAs (also involved: nested functions declared K)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30552 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|dave.pagan

[Bug c/46921] Dropped side effect with combination of statement expression and struct initializer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46921 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug ada/83535] [8 regression] indirect atomic access with wrong size

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83535 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug ada/83535] [8 regression] indirect atomic access with wrong size

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83535 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code Status|WAITING

[Bug debug/83157] [8 regression] gcc.dg/guality/pr41616-1.c fail

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83157 Aldy Hernandez changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug target/83467] [7/8 Regression] ICE: in assign_by_spills, at lra-assigns.c:1476: unable to find a register to spill with -flive-range-shrinkage -m8bit-idiv

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83467 --- Comment #5 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: uros Date: Thu Dec 21 20:48:34 2017 New Revision: 255956 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255956=gcc=rev Log: PR target/83467 * config/i386/i386.md (*ashl3_mask): Add

[Bug bootstrap/57076] @ in the src directory name causes failure while building of gcc.info

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57076 --- Comment #4 from Eric Gallager --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #3) > Maybe the best thing would be reject this during configure. > Since I can't think of anything better, agreed.

[Bug debug/83157] [8 regression] gcc.dg/guality/pr41616-1.c fail

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83157 --- Comment #5 from Aldy Hernandez --- Created attachment 42950 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42950=edit hacked up preprocessed file showing problem with only -O3 -g

[Bug c++/83406] [8 Regression] GCC8 can't deduce lambda return type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83406 --- Comment #4 from Nathan Sidwell --- Author: nathan Date: Thu Dec 21 19:16:01 2017 New Revision: 255950 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255950=gcc=rev Log: [PR c++/83406] deducing lambda type

[Bug c++/83406] [8 Regression] GCC8 can't deduce lambda return type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83406 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug rtl-optimization/80747] [6/7/8 Regression] gcc.dg/tree-ssa/tailrecursion-4.c fails with ICE when compiled with options "-fprofile-use -freorder-blocks-and-partition"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80747 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Thu Dec 21 19:28:10 2017 New Revision: 255954 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255954=gcc=rev Log: PR rtl-optimization/80747 PR rtl-optimization/83512 *

[Bug rtl-optimization/80747] [6/7 Regression] gcc.dg/tree-ssa/tailrecursion-4.c fails with ICE when compiled with options "-fprofile-use -freorder-blocks-and-partition"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80747 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[6/7/8 Regression] |[6/7 Regression]

[Bug tree-optimization/83521] [6/7 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed (error: invalid operand in unary operation)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83521 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[6/7/8 Regression] ICE: |[6/7 Regression] ICE:

[Bug tree-optimization/83523] [6/7 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed (error: statement marked for throw, but doesn't)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83523 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[6/7/8 Regression] ICE: |[6/7 Regression] ICE:

[Bug target/83467] [7/8 Regression] ICE: in assign_by_spills, at lra-assigns.c:1476: unable to find a register to spill with -flive-range-shrinkage -m8bit-idiv

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83467 --- Comment #4 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: uros Date: Thu Dec 21 19:00:28 2017 New Revision: 255949 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255949=gcc=rev Log: PR target/83467 * config/i386/i386.md (*ashl3_mask): Add

[Bug c++/83160] [8 regression] lvalue required as unary ‘&’ operand

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83160 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/83521] [6/7/8 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed (error: invalid operand in unary operation)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83521 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Thu Dec 21 19:26:34 2017 New Revision: 255952 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255952=gcc=rev Log: PR tree-optimization/83521 * tree-ssa-phiopt.c

[Bug rtl-optimization/83512] ICE: in df_compact_blocks, at df-core.c:1729 with -freorder-blocks-algorithm=simple

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83512 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Thu Dec 21 19:28:10 2017 New Revision: 255954 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255954=gcc=rev Log: PR rtl-optimization/80747 PR rtl-optimization/83512 *

[Bug tree-optimization/83523] [6/7/8 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed (error: statement marked for throw, but doesn't)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83523 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Thu Dec 21 19:27:21 2017 New Revision: 255953 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255953=gcc=rev Log: PR tree-optimization/83523 * tree-ssa-math-opts.c

<    1   2