https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84919
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|8.0 |9.0
--- Comment #13 from Jeffrey A. Law
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84957
Harald Anlauf changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gmx dot de
--- Comment #2 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85003
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Status|U
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85001
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85009
Bug ID: 85009
Summary: missing -Wdiscarded-qualifiers when dropping _Atomic
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84892
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84994
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85002
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85001
--- Comment #3 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #2)
> gfortran-8 changed at r254604 (pr78814).
> gfortran-7 changed at r256646.
> gfortran-6 changed at r256647.
Remove myself from CC list. My patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85009
--- Comment #1 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
It's not obvious that this is a bug, in that _Atomic is syntactically a
qualifier, but excluded semantically for most purposes. In particular,
that conversion is permitted by ISO C, so the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85001
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85001
--- Comment #5 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kargl
Date: Wed Mar 21 01:07:43 2018
New Revision: 258698
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258698&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-03-20 Steven G. Kargl
PR fortran/85001
==+
| 8.0.1 20180320 (experimental) [trunk revision 258670] (powerpc-linux-gnu) GCC
error:|
| in assemble_variable, at varasm.c:2297 |
| Error detected around ../../src/gcc/ada/libgnat/s-rident.ads:75:16 |
| Please submit a bug report; see https
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85010
--- Comment #1 from Matthias Klose ---
... and on aarch64-linux-gnu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85001
--- Comment #6 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kargl
Date: Wed Mar 21 01:26:25 2018
New Revision: 258699
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258699&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-03-20 Steven G. Kargl
PR fortran/85001
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85001
--- Comment #7 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kargl
Date: Wed Mar 21 01:27:42 2018
New Revision: 258700
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258700&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-03-20 Steven G. Kargl
PR fortran/85001
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85010
--- Comment #2 from Matthias Klose ---
last known successful build is r258631 on power*-linux-gnu and
aarch64-linux-gnu.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85001
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83789
--- Comment #21 from Kaushik.Phatak at kpit dot com ---
Hi Peter,
Thanks for your work on this.
>> Kaushik, remind me, you're seeing the same ICE in GCC 7 as well
Yes, this does fail in gcc-7.x.
>> so we need a backport of the patch committed to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85011
Bug ID: 85011
Summary: GCC complains that 2 identical function prototypes are
different
Product: gcc
Version: 7.3.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: diagnostic
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44348
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64925
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zeccav at gmail dot com
--- Co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85012
Bug ID: 85012
Summary: GCC does not inline extern "C" functions defined in a
different namespace
Product: gcc
Version: 7.3.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: misse
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84824
--- Comment #15 from linzj ---
The structalias solve_graph is not resolving the nodes reachable from a source
node, which make my try fail.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68155
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
--- C
201 - 225 of 225 matches
Mail list logo