https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85687
--- Comment #5 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kargl
Date: Fri May 11 17:58:03 2018
New Revision: 260174
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260174=gcc=rev
Log:
2018-05-11 Steven G. Kargl
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70870
--- Comment #12 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kargl
Date: Fri May 11 18:00:41 2018
New Revision: 260176
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260176=gcc=rev
Log:
2018-05-11 Steven G. Kargl
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33056
Bug 33056 depends on bug 70870, which changed state.
Bug 70870 Summary: Segmentation violation in gfc_assign_data_value
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70870
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70870
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84595
H. Peter Anvin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hpa at zytor dot com
--- Comment #9
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70870
--- Comment #13 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kargl
Date: Fri May 11 18:35:20 2018
New Revision: 260181
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260181=gcc=rev
Log:
2018-05-11 Steven G. Kargl
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85542
--- Comment #4 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kargl
Date: Fri May 11 18:58:21 2018
New Revision: 260182
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260182=gcc=rev
Log:
2018-05-11 Steven G. Kargl
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82899
--- Comment #16 from Marc Glisse ---
(patch should use 'fn && DECL_CONSTRUCTOR_P (fn)' since fn can be NULL)
As I was half expecting, messing with the types that directly doesn't work. It
means 'this' has type T*restrict, and if I try for
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85739
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85745
Bernd Edlinger changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85521
--- Comment #7 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kargl
Date: Fri May 11 17:30:57 2018
New Revision: 260170
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260170=gcc=rev
Log:
2018-05-11 Steven G. Kargl
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85687
--- Comment #4 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kargl
Date: Fri May 11 17:29:14 2018
New Revision: 260169
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260169=gcc=rev
Log:
2018-05-11 Steven G. Kargl
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70870
--- Comment #11 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kargl
Date: Fri May 11 17:32:28 2018
New Revision: 260171
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260171=gcc=rev
Log:
2018-05-11 Steven G. Kargl
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85722
--- Comment #9 from Chris Giorgi ---
Created attachment 44118
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44118=edit
gcc-7.3.1-r1.ebuild
Funtoo gcc ebuild attached, enabling go triggers libffi test failures.
Repo, including patches
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85643
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
Summary|attribute
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85749
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85753
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85755
Bug ID: 85755
Summary: PowerPC Gcc's -mupdate produces inefficient code on
power8/power9 machines
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85752
Bug ID: 85752
Summary: RFE: self-relative (prepickled) pointers
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: other
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85752
--- Comment #1 from H. Peter Anvin ---
N.B.: this presumably needs some kind of special treatment of NULL, to prevent
NULL from being an absolute value.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85753
Bug ID: 85753
Summary: missing -Wrestrict on memcpy into a member array
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85698
--- Comment #5 from Pat Haugen ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #4)
>
> Can you claify whether test, ref or train inputs fail for you? I tried
> AVX256, AVX128 and plain old SSE sofar without any issue but ref takes some
> time...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85754
Bug ID: 85754
Summary: missing -Wrestrict on memcpy with non-constant offsets
less than size
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82899
Marc Glisse changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #44112|0 |1
is obsolete|
101 - 124 of 124 matches
Mail list logo