https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95538
--- Comment #2 from Alexandre Oliva ---
More likely we've just always missed these lto dump files: IIRC they used to be
created in tmpdir, even during -save-temps builds.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95542
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-06-08
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95590
Bug ID: 95590
Summary: OpenACC 'attach' behavior if already attached to
different data
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: openacc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95591
Bug ID: 95591
Summary: [coroutines] ICE when co_yielding string literal from
generator coroutine
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95592
Bug ID: 95592
Summary: Collision with struct _Cosh when Cross compiling
libstdc++
Product: gcc
Version: 8.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95592
Kevin Stallard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Host|Ubuntu 20.04|Ubuntu 18.04.4
--- Comment #1 from Kevi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95592
--- Comment #2 from Kevin Stallard ---
Please forgive the fat fingers.
gcc 7.5.0 on Ubuntu 18.04.4 is the host used to build the cross compiler.
(In reply to Kevin Stallard from comment #1)
> I should also add that this was build with gcc 7.5.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95593
Bug ID: 95593
Summary: [c++20] decltype() on consteval compiles invalid code
Product: gcc
Version: 10.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95594
Bug ID: 95594
Summary: overzealous -Wmaybe-uninitialized calling a function
with an empty range of const pointers
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95595
Bug ID: 95595
Summary: [11 regression] ICE in building gcc after r11-959
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95581
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||segher at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95595
--- Comment #1 from Bill Seurer ---
OK, this will also fails on an LE system if I use --with-cpu=power7
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95572
--- Comment #2 from sujian.liu at huawei dot com ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #1)
> Hello.
> GCC 7.x is out of support, can you please test a newer release, ideally GCC
> 10.1 release?
I tried to compile with GCC 8.2.0, but no error
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95586
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
CC|
Hello!
I am writing to report a potential bug I encountered when playing with the
GIMPLE IR. I enabled the ASan and would like to print out all ASAN_MARK
statements for the following simple code:
int main(int argc ,char **argv)
{
int stack_array[100];
stack_array[1] = 100;
stack_array[arg
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95571
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Max Filippov :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1d9921cbdc732e1a7fc66b9c24a6dfa9625bd4c0
commit r11-1078-g1d9921cbdc732e1a7fc66b9c24a6dfa9625bd4c0
Author: Max Filippov
Date: Sat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95571
jcmvbkbc at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UN
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95018
--- Comment #38 from Jiu Fu Guo ---
(In reply to Thomas Koenig from comment #37)
> (In reply to Jiu Fu Guo from comment #36)
>
> Will you also backport to gcc 10, the other affected branch?
Yes, after it is stable on trunk, then backport to gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95596
Bug ID: 95596
Summary: string literal wrong overload resolution (char* vs
std::string)
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95581
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||seurer at linux dot
vnet.ibm.com
--- Com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95595
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95578
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-06-09
Status|UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88398
--- Comment #41 from Jiu Fu Guo ---
(In reply to Wilco from comment #40)
> (In reply to Jiu Fu Guo from comment #39)
> > I’m thinking to draft a patch for this optimization. If any suggestions,
> > please point out, thanks.
>
> Which optimizati
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88398
--- Comment #42 from Jiu Fu Guo ---
(In reply to Jiu Fu Guo from comment #41)
> (In reply to Wilco from comment #40)
> > (In reply to Jiu Fu Guo from comment #39)
> > > I’m thinking to draft a patch for this optimization. If any suggestions,
> >
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95597
Bug ID: 95597
Summary: Rejects using-declaration with "typename" in global
area
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priori
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95598
Bug ID: 95598
Summary: [coroutines] Destructor for object returned from
get_return_object() never called
Product: gcc
Version: 10.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95599
Bug ID: 95599
Summary: [coroutines] destructor for temporary operand to
co_yield expression called before end of
full-expression
Product: gcc
Version: 10.1.1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95599
--- Comment #1 from Lewis Baker ---
Note there is also some different behaviour if we change the example slightly
by removing awaitable::~awaitable() and leaving the awaitable type with a
trivial destructor.
See https://godbolt.org/z/ff5Uvy
In
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95527
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:653ab081391e9e7e38b304f3234323c93693d40c
commit r11-1080-g653ab081391e9e7e38b304f3234323c93693d40c
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: Tu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95580
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d6dbb71e468d0db561cc9eca99eeaca1efb81c11
commit r11-1081-gd6dbb71e468d0db561cc9eca99eeaca1efb81c11
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: Tu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95580
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95558
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
V
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95565
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95569
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
Please post patches to gcc-patches at gcc.gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95570
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener ---
Just spread the tests. Actual test coverage for all cases would be nice.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95576
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95581
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.0
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95582
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.0
Priority|P3
101 - 138 of 138 matches
Mail list logo
