Priority: P3
Component: ada
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: amodra at gmail dot com
When building mainline with STAGE1_CFLAGS="-g -O -fno-inline", with a system
gnat 4.6, I see
ada/cuintp.o: In function `UI_From_gnu':
/src/gcc-current/gcc/ad
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63225
--- Comment #1 from Alan Modra ---
Created attachment 33472
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33472&action=edit
Declare Vector_To_Uint
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61848
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amodra at gmail dot com
--- Comment #10
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61848
--- Comment #11 from Alan Modra ---
It boots
Linux version 3.17.0-rc4-00222-gc73f6fd-dirty (anton@tul181p1) (gcc version
5.0.0 20140912 (experimental) (GCC) ) #23 SMP Fri Sep 12 21:19:06 UTC 2014
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61848
--- Comment #12 from Alan Modra ---
extern char foo;
char foo __attribute__ ((__section__(".machine.desc")));
char foo __attribute__ ((__section__(".mymachine.desc")));
It looks like we should take out the DECL_SECTION_NAME (olddecl) == NULL
che
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63281
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amodra at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63281
--- Comment #2 from Alan Modra ---
Created attachment 33504
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33504&action=edit
this moves constants from the toc to rodata
For -mcmodel=medium it is just as efficient to load a constant from .r
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63281
--- Comment #3 from Alan Modra ---
Curiously, trunk + patch1 gives better usage of registers (only r31 of
non-volatile regs used) and find some fusion opportunities.
trunk+patch1+patch2 results in r27-r31 being used (r28-r31 for -mlra), and no
f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102485
--- Comment #10 from Alan Modra ---
I have spent some time over the last few days digging into history relevant to
this bug as part of looking into a binutils report that an ARCH=powerpc
CROSS_COMPILE=powerpc-linux- pmac32_defconfig linux kernel
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104671
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amodra at gmail dot com
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104894
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amodra at gmail dot com
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104894
--- Comment #4 from Alan Modra ---
Do check that the result is not a direct call. I think I was wrong to say the
assert could be removed (or modified as you have done).
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: amodra at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
>From https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28995
c++filt _RYAaca_NRYAaBa_a
AddressSanitizer:DEADLYSIG
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104894
--- Comment #6 from Alan Modra ---
I'm sorry, I forgot exactly what was happening when I talked about this on the
call. What I should have said is that -mlongcall code is correct but is
missing a sibcall optimisation. -fno-plt code (after remo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104894
--- Comment #7 from Alan Modra ---
So, similar code to what we have in rs6000_call_aix to handle
if ((INTVAL (cookie) & CALL_LONG) != 0
&& GET_CODE (func_desc) == SYMBOL_REF)
should be added to rs6000_sibcall_aix, I think.
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: amodra at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Compiling the attached readelf.i with -Wall -Werror -O2 using today's gcc
mainline on x86_64-linux results in complaints like
/home/alan/src/binutils-gdb/binutils/readelf.c: In fun
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102867
--- Comment #1 from Alan Modra ---
Created attachment 51641
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51641&action=edit
preprocessed source
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102867
--- Comment #3 from Alan Modra ---
Not that I'm really complaining about this, note also that the error message
referencing "filedata->section_headers + (sizetype)((long unsigned int)i * 80)"
is a little bit too much of compiler internal represe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103197
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amodra at gmail dot com
--- Comment #7
gnu.org |amodra at gmail dot com
Last reconfirmed||2020-09-24
CC||amodra at gmail dot com
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #2 from Alan Modra ---
Oops didn't put the PR numb
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97107
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Target|powerpc*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97166
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: amodra at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
static int __attribute__ ((__noclone__, __noinline__))
reg_args (int j1, int j2, int j3, int j4, int j5, int j6, int j7, int j8)
{
return j1 + j2 + j3 + j4 + j5 + j6 + j7 + j8;
}
int
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97267
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |amodra at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92564
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|amodra at gcc dot gnu.org |
--- Comment #2 from Alan Modra ---
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: amodra at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
during GIMPLE pass: evrp
/home/alan/src/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/mma-double-test.c: In
function 'MMA':
/home/alan/src/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/mma-double-te
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: amodra at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
-mcpu=power10 -O2 -mno-isel
/home/alan/src/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/ppc-ne0-1.c: In function
'ne0':
/home/alan/src/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/ppc-ne0-1.c:1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97360
--- Comment #3 from Alan Modra ---
Created attachment 49346
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49346&action=edit
reduced testcase
-mcpu=power10 -O2 -S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97360
--- Comment #4 from Alan Modra ---
Created attachment 49347
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49347&action=edit
original .i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97360
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bergner at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97360
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||powerpc64le-linux,
|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97360
--- Comment #10 from Alan Modra ---
Here's elf32-arc.i creduced.
a;
b();
c() {
void *d;
if (d == b && e())
d = a;
return d;
}
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97543
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amodra at gmail dot com
--- Comment #6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97267
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL|https://gcc.gnu.org/piperma |https://gcc.gnu.org/piperma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98125
--- Comment #14 from Alan Modra ---
-fpatchable-function-entry isn't used by the powerpc linux kernel.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93176
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL|https://gcc.gnu.org/piperma |https://gcc.gnu.org/piperma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98125
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
--- Comment #5 from Alan Modra ---
The
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98125
--- Comment #7 from Alan Modra ---
(In reply to Alan Modra from comment #5)
> So the "o" flag symbol is one in the .opd section, rather than what would be
> correct here, .L._Z3foov.
Actually, that breakage happened recently with commit 694d4a6d
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98125
--- Comment #8 from Alan Modra ---
Created attachment 49701
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49701&action=edit
fix powerpc64 -fpatchable-function-entry
This makes -fpatchable-function-entry do something sensible on powerpc64
Component: target
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: amodra at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
gcc.dg/split-1.exe and other split-stack executables broke recently on
powerpc64le-linux, most likely due to git commit 6fbec038f7a7.
I see
[22] .init_array
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98210
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|MOVED |---
Status|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98519
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amodra at gmail dot com
--- Comment #18
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98125
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #49701|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98125
--- Comment #12 from Alan Modra ---
Created attachment 50039
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50039&action=edit
ELFv1 support
Revised patches. I wasn't happy with the use of a ".text" symbol in the
previous patch since some
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63281
--- Comment #15 from Alan Modra ---
(In reply to Jiu Fu Guo from comment #14)
> It would be a way to keep the data in memory(.rodata) through adjusting the
> cost of constant.
Yes, I posted a series of patches that fix this problem and other rtx
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: amodra at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
>From https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28736
valgrind c++filt -s gnat vfSO__fffSO
==1573233== Invalid write of size 1
==1573233==at 0x4848DCC: str
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95126
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amodra at gmail dot com
--- Comment #5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97361
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
||amodra at gmail dot com
--- Comment #4 from Alan Modra ---
The disassembly says this is powerpc64le. Possibly interesting fact: the
offsets used above the stack frame are 400, 432, 440, which all correspond to
the parameter save area. I don't see any reason that DGEBAL s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100407
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amodra at gmail dot com
--- Comment #13
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99888
--- Comment #8 from Alan Modra ---
(In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #7)
> '-fpatchable-function-entry=N[,M]'
> Generate N NOPs right at the beginning of each function, with the
> function entry point before the Mth NOP.
Bad
||https://gcc.gnu.org/piperma
||il/gcc-patches/2020-October
||/555760.html
Assignee|amodra at gmail dot com|unassigned at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- Comment #8 from Alan Modra
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61032
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|amodra at gmail dot com|unassigned at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101393
--- Comment #11 from Alan Modra ---
Preserving certain -m gas options goes back to this patch:
https://sourceware.org/pipermail/binutils/2008-January/054935.html
Given the number of ppc micros around with differing functional units, it is
quite
Component: plugins
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: amodra at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
>From https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28179
binutils/nm-new --plugin ~/build/gcc-virgin/lto-plugin/.libs/liblto_plugin.so
-a pr28
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101810
--- Comment #1 from Alan Modra ---
Created attachment 51272
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51272&action=edit
Proposed fix
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99759
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amodra at gmail dot com
Status
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101810
--- Comment #3 from Alan Modra ---
Making SYMESZ a size_t as the patch does, is a complete fix if the code is only
compiled for 64-bit hosts where unsigned int is smaller than size_t. If
compiled for 32-bit then the expression calculating buffe
-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: amodra at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Seen on attempting to build binutils for x86_64-linux with current mainline gcc
/home/alan/build/gcc-virgin/gcc/xgcc -B/home/alan/build/gcc-virgin/gcc/
-DHAVE_CONFIG_H
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101977
--- Comment #6 from Alan Modra ---
(In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #5)
> The -Warray-bounds for section.c is gone
Thanks for fixing that.
> but last night's build still shows
> a large number of -Warray-bounds instances as well as other
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46981
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amodra at gmail dot com
--- Comment #3
||2021-09-05
Resolution|MOVED |---
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Version|7.5.0 |12.0
CC||amodra at gmail dot com
--- Comment #3 from Alan Modra ---
Even
||amodra at gmail dot com
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Version|unknown |12.0
Last reconfirmed||2021-09-05
--- Comment #4 from Alan Modra ---
Yes, gcc's libiberty is still considered upstream of bin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109308
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amodra at gmail dot com
--- Comment #4
: demangler
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: amodra at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
>From zhoug...@mail.zgclab.edu.cn and wan...@mail.zgclab.edu.cn:
Hi, we found several crashes in c++filt(Binutils 2.42), which is the latest
version.
In detail,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114830
--- Comment #1 from Alan Modra ---
Created attachment 58020
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58020&action=edit
asan report summary
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114830
--- Comment #2 from Alan Modra ---
Created attachment 58021
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58021&action=edit
c++filt crash binaries
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108147
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amodra at gmail dot com
--- Comment #14
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108315
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amodra at gmail dot com
--- Comment #5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108727
--- Comment #3 from Alan Modra ---
Yes, looks good to me.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93176
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|amodra at gcc dot gn
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113652
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amodra at gmail dot com
--- Comment #14
801 - 872 of 872 matches
Mail list logo
