[Bug fortran/103418] random_number() does not accept pointer, intent(in) array argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103418 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/103418] random_number() does not accept pointer, intent(in) array argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103418 --- Comment #4 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to kargl from comment #3) > (In reply to anlauf from comment #2) > > The nearly obvious fix: > > > > diff --git a/gcc/fortran/check.c b/gcc/fortran/check.c

[Bug fortran/103418] random_number() does not accept pointer, intent(in) array argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103418 --- Comment #6 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Unfortunately the patch in comment#5 does not work for me. :-( Interestingly, the Intel compiler fails on the testcase, too.

[Bug fortran/103418] random_number() does not accept pointer, intent(in) array argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103418 --- Comment #10 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Steve Kargl from comment #9) > "does not work for me" isn't too descriptive. Well, you fixed a related issue, but not the problem in comment#0. Try your p

[Bug fortran/103392] [9/10/11 Regression] ICE in simplify_bound, at fortran/simplify.c:4273

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103392 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status

[Bug fortran/102787] ICE in new test case gfortran.dg/reshape_shape_2.f90

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102787 --- Comment #8 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Simpler and better patch which handles array sections as well as vector subscripts: diff --git a/gcc/fortran/array.c b/gcc/fortran/array.c index 6552eaf3b0c..f870c225195 100644 --- a/gcc/fortran

[Bug fortran/84693] scalar DT not broadcast across an array in an initialization expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84693 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING CC

[Bug fortran/59298] ICE when initialising PARAMETER array of derived-type (containing an array) using array constructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59298 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/103263] ICE in gfc_check_reshape, at fortran/check.c:4830

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103263 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/103261] ICE in gfc_check_reshape, at fortran/check.c:4742

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103261 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/101565] ICE in gfc_simplify_image_index, at fortran/simplify.c:8234

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101565 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/103473] [11/12 Regression] ICE in simplify_minmaxloc_nodim, at fortran/simplify.c:5287

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103473 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-11-29 Ever

[Bug fortran/103473] [11/12 Regression] ICE in simplify_minmaxloc_nodim, at fortran/simplify.c:5287

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103473 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee

[Bug fortran/101565] ICE in gfc_simplify_image_index, at fortran/simplify.c:8234

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101565 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution

[Bug fortran/103496] [F2018][TS29113] C_SIZEOF – rejects now valid args with 'must be an interoperable data entity'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103496 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/102787] ICE in new test case gfortran.dg/reshape_shape_2.f90

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102787 --- Comment #9 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to anlauf from comment #8) > Simpler and better patch which handles array sections as well as vector > subscripts: @Bill: does this patch or the submitted one in https://gcc.g

[Bug fortran/103505] ICE in compare_bound_mpz_t, at fortran/resolve.c:4587

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103505 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW CC

[Bug fortran/103504] ICE in get_sym_storage_size, at fortran/interface.c:2800

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103504 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-11-30

[Bug fortran/103261] ICE in gfc_check_reshape, at fortran/check.c:4742

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103261 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE

[Bug fortran/102787] ICE in new test case gfortran.dg/reshape_shape_2.f90

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102787 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||gs...@t-online.de

[Bug fortran/103263] ICE in gfc_check_reshape, at fortran/check.c:4830

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103263 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution

[Bug fortran/102787] ICE in new test case gfortran.dg/reshape_shape_2.f90

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102787 --- Comment #12 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- *** Bug 103263 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug fortran/103283] ICE in gfc_trans_array_constructor_subarray, at fortran/trans-array.c:1972

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103283 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0

[Bug fortran/103283] ICE in gfc_trans_array_constructor_subarray, at fortran/trans-array.c:1972

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103283 --- Comment #3 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- There's more to it: program p type t integer :: a(1) = 2 end type type(t), parameter :: x(1) = t(3) integer, parameter :: k(*) = x(1)%a end This fails with: pr103283-z1.f90

[Bug fortran/103505] ICE in compare_bound_mpz_t, at fortran/resolve.c:4587 since r8-7594-g078c5aff5ed83e9c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103505 --- Comment #4 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to kargl from comment #2) > diff --git a/gcc/fortran/array.c b/gcc/fortran/array.c > index 6552eaf3b0c..1b2f5b310a7 100644 > --- a/gcc/fortran/array.c > +++ b/gcc/for

[Bug fortran/103505] ICE in compare_bound_mpz_t, at fortran/resolve.c:4587 since r8-7594-g078c5aff5ed83e9c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103505 --- Comment #6 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Steve Kargl from comment #5) > Ah yes. Good catch. Are you going to insert the 2 lines > lower int the file? If so, I think you can considered > the patch complete and

[Bug fortran/103505] ICE in compare_bound_mpz_t, at fortran/resolve.c:4587 since r8-7594-g078c5aff5ed83e9c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103505 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |anlauf at gcc dot

[Bug fortran/103283] ICE in gfc_trans_array_constructor_subarray, at fortran/trans-array.c:1972

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103283 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code --- Comment #4

[Bug fortran/103505] ICE in compare_bound_mpz_t, at fortran/resolve.c:4587 since r8-7594-g078c5aff5ed83e9c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103505 --- Comment #11 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Steve Kargl from comment #10) > On Thu, Dec 02, 2021 at 09:51:23PM +0000, anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > > > > Submitted as: > > https://gcc.gnu.org/p

[Bug fortran/103283] ICE in gfc_trans_array_constructor_subarray, at fortran/trans-array.c:1972

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103283 --- Comment #5 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- I did get some progress with the attempt: diff --git a/gcc/fortran/expr.c b/gcc/fortran/expr.c index 87089321a3b..d5bbcd493b6 100644 --- a/gcc/fortran/expr.c +++ b/gcc/fortran/expr.c @@ -1929,6

[Bug fortran/103473] [11/12 Regression] ICE in simplify_minmaxloc_nodim, at fortran/simplify.c:5287

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103473 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status

[Bug fortran/103567] Compile error with assumed-rank RESULT variable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103567 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution

[Bug fortran/103418] random_number() does not accept pointer, intent(in) array argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103418 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |anlauf at gcc dot

[Bug fortran/101632] NON_RECURSIVE procedure prefix is unsupported. F2018 defaults to recursive procedures.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101632 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-12-06

[Bug fortran/103588] ICE: Simplification error in gfc_ref_dimen_size, at fortran/array.c:2407

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103588 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-12-06

[Bug fortran/103588] ICE: Simplification error in gfc_ref_dimen_size, at fortran/array.c:2407

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103588 --- Comment #2 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Untested patch: diff --git a/gcc/fortran/array.c b/gcc/fortran/array.c index 5762c8d92d4..5f9ed17f919 100644 --- a/gcc/fortran/array.c +++ b/gcc/fortran/array.c @@ -2403,11 +2403,9

[Bug fortran/103589] ICE in gfc_match_varspec, at fortran/primary.c:2551

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103589 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-12-06

[Bug fortran/103591] ICE in gfc_compare_string, at fortran/arith.c:1119

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103591 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status

[Bug fortran/103591] ICE in gfc_compare_string, at fortran/arith.c:1119

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103591 --- Comment #2 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Untested fix: diff --git a/gcc/fortran/match.c b/gcc/fortran/match.c index 2bf21434a42..52bc5af7542 100644 --- a/gcc/fortran/match.c +++ b/gcc/fortran/match.c @@ -6075,6 +6075,15

[Bug fortran/103591] ICE in gfc_compare_string, at fortran/arith.c:1119

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103591 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee

[Bug fortran/103588] ICE: Simplification error in gfc_ref_dimen_size, at fortran/array.c:2407

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103588 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee

[Bug fortran/103591] ICE in gfc_compare_string, at fortran/arith.c:1119

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103591 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution

[Bug fortran/103607] [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE in do_subscript, at fortran/frontend-passes.c:2927

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103607 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Assignee

[Bug fortran/103610] ICE in gfc_convert_mpz_to_signed, at fortran/simplify.c:193

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103610 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0

[Bug fortran/103610] ICE in gfc_convert_mpz_to_signed, at fortran/simplify.c:193

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103610 --- Comment #3 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Tentative patch: diff --git a/gcc/fortran/array.c b/gcc/fortran/array.c index e5e22099405..a23fabbdcdb 100644 --- a/gcc/fortran/array.c +++ b/gcc/fortran/array.c @@ -2330,6 +2330,9

[Bug fortran/103610] ICE in gfc_convert_mpz_to_signed, at fortran/simplify.c:193

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103610 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |anlauf at gcc dot

[Bug fortran/103609] [11/12 Regression] ICE in gfc_sym_get_dummy_args, at fortran/symbol.c:5243 since r11-2578-g27eac9ee6137a6b5

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103609 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/103609] [11/12 Regression] ICE in gfc_sym_get_dummy_args, at fortran/symbol.c:5243 since r11-2578-g27eac9ee6137a6b5

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103609 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 Status|NEW

[Bug fortran/103634] New: Runtime crash with PACK on zero-sized arrays

: fortran Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- I thought we had fixed this one (see PR31001), but maybe not completely: program p implicit none type t real :: r(24) = -99. end type type(t), allocatable

[Bug libfortran/103634] Runtime crash with PACK on zero-sized arrays

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103634 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Component|fortran |libfortran Last

[Bug libfortran/103634] Runtime crash with PACK on zero-sized arrays

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103634 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |anlauf at gcc dot

[Bug fortran/103609] [11/12 Regression] ICE in gfc_sym_get_dummy_args, at fortran/symbol.c:5243 since r11-2578-g27eac9ee6137a6b5

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103609 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status

[Bug fortran/103607] [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE in do_subscript, at fortran/frontend-passes.c:2927

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103607 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution

[Bug fortran/103606] [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE in resolve_fl_procedure, at fortran/resolve.c:13297 since r9-3324-g2b03b800d866d345

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103606 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/103606] [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE in resolve_fl_procedure, at fortran/resolve.c:13297 since r9-3324-g2b03b800d866d345

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103606 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |anlauf at gcc dot

[Bug fortran/103411] ICE in gfc_conv_array_initializer, at fortran/trans-array.c:6377

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103411 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution

[Bug fortran/102717] ICE in gfc_simplify_reshape, at fortran/simplify.c:6843

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102717 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution

[Bug fortran/102787] ICE in new test case gfortran.dg/reshape_shape_2.f90

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102787 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution

[Bug fortran/103472] ICE in gfc_conv_ss_startstride, at fortran/trans-array.c:4527

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103472 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-12-12

[Bug fortran/99256] ICE in variable_check, at fortran/check.c:1012

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99256 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/103692] [11/12 Regression] ICE in add_init_expr_to_sym, at fortran/decl.c:2062

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103692 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-12-13

[Bug fortran/103692] [11/12 Regression] ICE in add_init_expr_to_sym, at fortran/decl.c:2062

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103692 --- Comment #2 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- It is probably easier to compare character(*), parameter :: b(*) = (a(2:1)) ! ICE vs. character(*), parameter :: b(*) = a(2:1) ! no ICE

[Bug fortran/103707] Stray "Array operands are incommensurate"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103707 --- Comment #2 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Could it be the overflow simplifying fmax/fmin triggering this?

[Bug fortran/103662] TBAA problem in Fortran FE triggering in gfortran.dg/unlimited_polymorphic_3.f03

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103662 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/103718] [11/12 Regression] ICE in doloop_contained_procedure_code, at fortran/frontend-passes.c:2393

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103718 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 CC

[Bug fortran/103719] [11/12 Regression] ICE in doloop_contained_procedure_code, at fortran/frontend-passes.c:2465

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103719 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-12-14

[Bug fortran/103718] [11/12 Regression] ICE in doloop_contained_procedure_code, at fortran/frontend-passes.c:2393

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103718 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |anlauf at gcc dot

[Bug fortran/103717] ICE in doloop_code, at fortran/frontend-passes.c:2656

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103717 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-12-14

[Bug fortran/103717] ICE in doloop_code, at fortran/frontend-passes.c:2656

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103717 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee

[Bug fortran/103718] [11/12 Regression] ICE in doloop_contained_procedure_code, at fortran/frontend-passes.c:2393

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103718 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status

[Bug fortran/103719] [11/12 Regression] ICE in doloop_contained_procedure_code, at fortran/frontend-passes.c:2465

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103719 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status

[Bug fortran/103716] [10/11/12 Regression] ICE in gimplify_expr, at gimplify.c:15964 since r9-3803-ga5fbc2f36a291cbe

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103716 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/103693] [12 Regression] ICE in gfc_array_dimen_size(): Bad EXPR_ARRAY expr since r12-4967-gbcf3728abe848888

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103693 --- Comment #2 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Gerhard, the issue here is class(*), parameter :: a(1,2) = 2 which we do not yet support, and where there is a duplicate by you already.

[Bug fortran/103694] [12 Regression] ICE in gfc_conv_expr_op, at fortran/trans-expr.c:3882 since r12-3993-gb19bbfb148250536

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103694 --- Comment #2 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #1) > Started with r12-3993-gb19bbfb148250536. Are you sure about that? All releases >= 7 ICE for me.

[Bug fortran/103716] [10/11/12 Regression] ICE in gimplify_expr, at gimplify.c:15964 since r9-3803-ga5fbc2f36a291cbe

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103716 --- Comment #4 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to G. Steinmetz from comment #3) > On my environment(s) the history for r9 is as follows : > ><= 20181028 : Error: Unexpected '%' for nonderived-typ

[Bug fortran/103716] [10/11/12 Regression] ICE in gimplify_expr, at gimplify.c:15964 since r9-3803-ga5fbc2f36a291cbe

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103716 --- Comment #5 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- The following partial revert of r10-7334 avoids the ICE and restores the bug in gcc-9: diff --git a/gcc/fortran/resolve.c b/gcc/fortran/resolve.c index bff1b35446f..245c4e1683f 100644 --- a/gcc

[Bug fortran/103717] ICE in doloop_code, at fortran/frontend-passes.c:2656

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103717 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status

[Bug fortran/103606] [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE in resolve_fl_procedure, at fortran/resolve.c:13297 since r9-3324-g2b03b800d866d345

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103606 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution

[Bug fortran/103757] [F18] compiler rejects import, {none, all, only}, does not recognize the keyword

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103757 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Keywords

[Bug fortran/103412] [10/11/12 Regression] ICE: Invalid expression in gfc_element_size since r10-2083-g8dc63166e0b85954

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103412 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/103260] ICE in gfc_simplify_reshape, at fortran/simplify.c:6857 since r6-4614-g57e596204fceef2e

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103260 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/103260] ICE in gfc_simplify_reshape, at fortran/simplify.c:6857 since r6-4614-g57e596204fceef2e

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103260 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution

[Bug fortran/103610] ICE in gfc_convert_mpz_to_signed, at fortran/simplify.c:193

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103610 --- Comment #8 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- *** Bug 103260 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug fortran/103610] ICE in gfc_convert_mpz_to_signed, at fortran/simplify.c:193

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103610 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution

[Bug fortran/103412] [10/11/12 Regression] ICE: Invalid expression in gfc_element_size since r10-2083-g8dc63166e0b85954

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103412 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |anlauf at gcc dot

[Bug fortran/103412] [10/11/12 Regression] ICE: Invalid expression in gfc_element_size since r10-2083-g8dc63166e0b85954

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103412 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution

[Bug fortran/103588] ICE: Simplification error in gfc_ref_dimen_size, at fortran/array.c:2407

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103588 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |9.5 Resolution

[Bug fortran/103505] [9 Regression] ICE in compare_bound_mpz_t, at fortran/resolve.c:4587 since r8-7594-g078c5aff5ed83e9c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103505 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||12.0 Summary|ICE

[Bug fortran/103776] ICE in gfc_compare_string, at fortran/arith.c:1118

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103776 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW CC

[Bug fortran/103777] ICE in gfc_simplify_maskl, at fortran/simplify.c:4918

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103777 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/103778] [10/11/12 Regression] ICE: Invalid expression in gfc_element_size

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103778 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-12-20

[Bug fortran/103776] ICE in gfc_compare_string, at fortran/arith.c:1118

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103776 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |anlauf at gcc dot

[Bug fortran/103778] [10/11/12 Regression] ICE: Invalid expression in gfc_element_size

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103778 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee

[Bug fortran/103777] ICE in gfc_simplify_maskl, at fortran/simplify.c:4918

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103777 --- Comment #3 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Minimal fix (for maskl): diff --git a/gcc/fortran/simplify.c b/gcc/fortran/simplify.c index 90067b6bbe6..45080e8b912 100644 --- a/gcc/fortran/simplify.c +++ b/gcc/fortran/simplify.c @@ -4909,6

[Bug fortran/103777] ICE in gfc_simplify_maskl, at fortran/simplify.c:4918

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103777 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee

[Bug fortran/103794] ICE in gfc_check_reshape, at fortran/check.c:4727

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103794 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-12-21

[Bug fortran/101997] [9 regression] ICE after r9-8665 at gcc/toplev.c:326

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101997 --- Comment #4 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- I have run the testcase under the debugger and the longest arguments to sprintf I have found is "m234567890123456789012345678901234567890123456789012345678

[Bug fortran/87737] ICE tree check: expected ssa_name, have addr_expr in remap_gimple_op_r, at tree-inline.c:923

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87737 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|ice-on-valid-code |diagnostic

[Bug fortran/87737] ICE tree check: expected ssa_name, have addr_expr in remap_gimple_op_r, at tree-inline.c:923

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87737 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee

[Bug fortran/99819] [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE in gfc_defer_symbol_init, at fortran/trans-decl.c:841

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99819 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org

<    9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   >