https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102599
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102620
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102458
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |10.4
Status|ASSI
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102582
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|U
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102595
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102638
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57360
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vivekrao4 at yahoo dot com
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87403
Bug 87403 depends on bug 102638, which changed state.
Bug 102638 Summary: Add warning for implicit save
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102638
What|Removed |Added
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65454
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2021-09-12 00:00:00 |2021-10-8
Assignee|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65454
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99348
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |anlauf at gcc dot
gnu.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65141
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67972
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zbeekman at gmail dot com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65144
Bug 65144 depends on bug 65141, which changed state.
Bug 65141 Summary: ISO_10646 constant parameters convert kind when used with
substring references
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65141
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88488
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102685
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102685
--- Comment #3 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Preliminary patch (untested):
diff --git a/gcc/fortran/resolve.c b/gcc/fortran/resolve.c
index 0d0af39d23f..c5df42ba67a 100644
--- a/gcc/fortran/resolve.c
+++ b/gcc/fortran/resolve.c
@@ -1333,6 +
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102716
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102717
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102717
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102716
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |anlauf at gcc dot
gnu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102685
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102787
--- Comment #1 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Interesting. Cannot reproduce on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu.
However, changing the testcase as follows:
program p
integer, parameter :: a(1) = 2
! integer, parameter :: b(2) = reshape([3,4], -[a]) !
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102787
--- Comment #2 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The wrong locus for comment#1 is fixed by:
diff --git a/gcc/fortran/check.c b/gcc/fortran/check.c
index cfaf9d26bbc..bfb371b82c9 100644
--- a/gcc/fortran/check.c
+++ b/gcc/fortran/check.c
@@ -474
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102787
--- Comment #5 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Looks like an issue with simplification of array within array constructor:
print *, - a
print *, - [a]
print *, - [[a]]
end
-fdump-fortran-original produces:
code:
WRITE UNIT=6 FMT
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102787
--- Comment #6 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
WIP patch that fixes comment#5 as like comment#0 and regtests cleanly:
diff --git a/gcc/fortran/array.c b/gcc/fortran/array.c
index 6552eaf3b0c..e1ab2e06fdb 100644
--- a/gcc/fortran/array.c
+++ b
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102787
--- Comment #7 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Slightly improved version of the patch of comment#6:
diff --git a/gcc/fortran/array.c b/gcc/fortran/array.c
index 6552eaf3b0c..a63a6631f59 100644
--- a/gcc/fortran/array.c
+++ b/gcc/fortran/array
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102816
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |anlauf at gcc dot
gnu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102891
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFI
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102817
--- Comment #3 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Strange. We happen to call gfc_free_shape with inconsistent data:
(gdb) p rank
$84 = 2
(gdb) p shape[1]
$85 = (mpz_t *) 0x0
Not good.
Interestingly the following works:
integer :: z(1,2) =
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102817
--- Comment #4 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Furthermore the "scalar" variants work:
...
type(t), parameter :: u= t(4)
...
y = (u%a)
...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102716
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASS
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102891
--- Comment #2 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Adding to main the lines
print *, size (transfer ( w%z%re ,[1.0_dp]))
print *, size (transfer ([w%z%re],[1.0_dp]))
prints
4
2
whereas e.g.
print *, size (transfer
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102917
Bug ID: 102917
Summary: [PDT] KIND and LEN type parameters shall not be
restricted to default integer
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102917
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102917
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67542
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102685
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gerhard.steinmetz.fortran@t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100970
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102685
--- Comment #8 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
*** Bug 100970 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102900
--- Comment #4 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The ICE is resolved by Jose's patch to PR100136, which was just accepted.
It would also need to get backported to 11-branch.
However, a runtime error will remain:
At line 91 of file gcc/testsuit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102900
--- Comment #5 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to anlauf from comment #4)
> The ICE is resolved by Jose's patch to PR100136, which was just accepted.
... but not for proc_ptr_52.f90 with -fcheck=pointer
I've stared at the logic and
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102956
Bug ID: 102956
Summary: [PDT] KIND and LEN type parameters are mutually
exclusive
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102956
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-10-26
Ever confirme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102956
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86551
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69419
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102966
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-10-27
Known to wor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102917
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.3
Status|ASSI
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99250
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102966
--- Comment #4 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #3)
> This was added in r11-5064-g0c81ccc3d87098b93b0e6a2dd76815e4d6e78ff0
Right, thanks. There were a couple of regressions introduced by this patch,
and
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102966
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102973
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99853
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99853
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103008
--- Comment #5 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
There's a mixture of single and double precision in the testcase variants.
I haven't checked thoroughly enough if both variants are really equivalent.
Do you see the issue if you have only single
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102715
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |anlauf at gcc dot
gnu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102817
--- Comment #5 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I'm testing the following fix:
diff --git a/gcc/fortran/expr.c b/gcc/fortran/expr.c
index 4dea840e348..c5360dfaede 100644
--- a/gcc/fortran/expr.c
+++ b/gcc/fortran/expr.c
@@ -2129,6 +2129,7 @@ s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102817
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |anlauf at gcc dot
gnu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103045
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98490
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||krefson at gmail dot com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103058
--- Comment #7 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #6)
> Looking at the particular ICE, this looks like a fortran frond-end issue -
> this is during compilation and not during link and I do not see why Fortran
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69419
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSI
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101602
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-11-06
C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102727
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101632
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103112
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-11-06
Statu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103054
--- Comment #5 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Please have a look at the testsuite, too.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99602
--- Comment #14 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Jürgen Reuter from comment #13)
> Cool, thanks for the quick reaction, Paul. Maybe Harald can have a look at
> it as well :D
LGTM. It's by Paul. He simply needs to get the testcase
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99138
--- Comment #7 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The patch in comment#6 generates an unexpected error:
pr99138.f90:11:2:
11 | module function f(x)
| 1
Error: Type mismatch in function result (CLASS(STAR)/CLASS(*)) between the
MODULE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99138
--- Comment #8 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The check in interface.c:gfc_check_result_characteristics has an asymmetry
coming from symbol.c:gfc_type_compatible that could be evaded by swapping
arguments:
diff --git a/gcc/fortran/interface.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99602
--- Comment #16 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Jürgen Reuter from comment #15)
> > LGTM. It's by Paul. He simply needs to get the testcase's dg-foo right...
> > ;-)
>
> Now I'm confused. So you consider the fix ok? Will it then
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99609
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99205
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99688
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99709
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Summary|VALUE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99369
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99740
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-03-23
Ever confirmed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96859
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING
--- Comment #13 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96012
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
--- Comment #6 from a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99348
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99798
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99817
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99819
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99840
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99839
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99839
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.5
Summary|ICE in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99840
--- Comment #4 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
For reasons I do not understand,
Breakpoint 1, gfc_simplify_matmul (matrix_a=0x292bbf0, matrix_b=0x292c550)
at ../../gcc-trunk/gcc/fortran/simplify.c:4777
4777 result_columns = mpz_ge
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99840
--- Comment #5 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
OK, now I see it. gfc_get_shape does not init the resulting shape.
The following simpler patch does the job:
diff --git a/gcc/fortran/simplify.c b/gcc/fortran/simplify.c
index 388aca7c38c..c27b47
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99840
--- Comment #8 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Patch: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2021-March/055897.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99840
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63797
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63797
--- Comment #4 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The following patch regtests ok and fixes the testcase:
diff --git a/gcc/fortran/module.c b/gcc/fortran/module.c
index 4db0a3ac76d..b4b7b437f86 100644
--- a/gcc/fortran/module.c
+++ b/gcc/fortran/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63797
--- Comment #6 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Steve, can you give an example for the procedure pointer case you mentioned?
I played a bit, but the only valid code that I can think of did not produce
a reference to sqrt in such a way that it ne
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63797
--- Comment #8 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Steve Kargl from comment #7)
> which looks like a default initialization. Does sqrt need to be
> recorded into the module? If not, then your patch is probably ok.
My patch actually
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63797
--- Comment #9 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Patch: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2021-April/055935.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63797
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99255
--- Comment #2 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Replacing
class(t) :: x
by
class(t), allocatable :: x
avoids the ICE. Could be an error recovery issue.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100136
--- Comment #2 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
We do not properly handle the VALUE attribute.
Reduced testcase:
program p
implicit none
class(*), allocatable :: d
call add_class (d)
contains
subroutine add_class (d)
class(*), val
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100154
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
CC|
1001 - 1100 of 1825 matches
Mail list logo
