[Bug fortran/102917] [PDT] KIND and LEN type parameters shall not be restricted to default integer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102917 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 CC|

[Bug fortran/102917] [PDT] KIND and LEN type parameters shall not be restricted to default integer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102917 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug fortran/102917] New: [PDT] KIND and LEN type parameters shall not be restricted to default integer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102917 Bug ID: 102917 Summary: [PDT] KIND and LEN type parameters shall not be restricted to default integer Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug fortran/67542] ICE in gfc_emit_parameter_debug_info, at fortran/trans-decl.c:4947 and :4945

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67542 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/102685] [12 Regression] ICE in output_constructor_regular_field, at varasm.c:5514 since r12-4278-g74ccca380cde5e79

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102685 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||gerhard.steinmetz.fortran@t

[Bug fortran/102900] ICE via gfc_class_data_get with alloc_comp_class_4.f03 or proc_ptr_52.f90 using -fcheck=all

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102900 --- Comment #4 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- The ICE is resolved by Jose's patch to PR100136, which was just accepted. It would also need to get backported to 11-branch. However, a runtime error will remain: At line 91 of file

[Bug fortran/103473] [11/12 Regression] ICE in simplify_minmaxloc_nodim, at fortran/simplify.c:5287

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103473 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug fortran/101565] ICE in gfc_simplify_image_index, at fortran/simplify.c:8234

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101565 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/103473] [11/12 Regression] ICE in simplify_minmaxloc_nodim, at fortran/simplify.c:5287

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103473 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-11-29 Ever

[Bug fortran/103283] ICE in gfc_trans_array_constructor_subarray, at fortran/trans-array.c:1972

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103283 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code --- Comment #4

[Bug fortran/103505] ICE in compare_bound_mpz_t, at fortran/resolve.c:4587 since r8-7594-g078c5aff5ed83e9c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103505 --- Comment #11 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Steve Kargl from comment #10) > On Thu, Dec 02, 2021 at 09:51:23PM +, anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > > > > Submitted as: > >

[Bug fortran/103588] ICE: Simplification error in gfc_ref_dimen_size, at fortran/array.c:2407

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103588 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-12-06

[Bug fortran/103591] ICE in gfc_compare_string, at fortran/arith.c:1119

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103591 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1

[Bug fortran/103588] ICE: Simplification error in gfc_ref_dimen_size, at fortran/array.c:2407

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103588 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug fortran/101632] NON_RECURSIVE procedure prefix is unsupported. F2018 defaults to recursive procedures.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101632 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-12-06

[Bug fortran/103588] ICE: Simplification error in gfc_ref_dimen_size, at fortran/array.c:2407

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103588 --- Comment #2 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Untested patch: diff --git a/gcc/fortran/array.c b/gcc/fortran/array.c index 5762c8d92d4..5f9ed17f919 100644 --- a/gcc/fortran/array.c +++ b/gcc/fortran/array.c @@ -2403,11 +2403,9 @@

[Bug fortran/103591] ICE in gfc_compare_string, at fortran/arith.c:1119

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103591 --- Comment #2 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Untested fix: diff --git a/gcc/fortran/match.c b/gcc/fortran/match.c index 2bf21434a42..52bc5af7542 100644 --- a/gcc/fortran/match.c +++ b/gcc/fortran/match.c @@ -6075,6 +6075,15 @@

[Bug fortran/103591] ICE in gfc_compare_string, at fortran/arith.c:1119

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103591 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug fortran/103589] ICE in gfc_match_varspec, at fortran/primary.c:2551

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103589 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-12-06

[Bug fortran/103283] ICE in gfc_trans_array_constructor_subarray, at fortran/trans-array.c:1972

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103283 --- Comment #5 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- I did get some progress with the attempt: diff --git a/gcc/fortran/expr.c b/gcc/fortran/expr.c index 87089321a3b..d5bbcd493b6 100644 --- a/gcc/fortran/expr.c +++ b/gcc/fortran/expr.c @@ -1929,6

[Bug fortran/103473] [11/12 Regression] ICE in simplify_minmaxloc_nodim, at fortran/simplify.c:5287

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103473 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED

[Bug fortran/103757] [F18] compiler rejects import, {none, all, only}, does not recognize the keyword

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103757 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Keywords|

[Bug fortran/103588] ICE: Simplification error in gfc_ref_dimen_size, at fortran/array.c:2407

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103588 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |9.5 Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/103412] [10/11/12 Regression] ICE: Invalid expression in gfc_element_size since r10-2083-g8dc63166e0b85954

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103412 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/103505] [9 Regression] ICE in compare_bound_mpz_t, at fortran/resolve.c:4587 since r8-7594-g078c5aff5ed83e9c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103505 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||12.0 Summary|ICE

[Bug fortran/103260] ICE in gfc_simplify_reshape, at fortran/simplify.c:6857 since r6-4614-g57e596204fceef2e

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103260 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/103260] ICE in gfc_simplify_reshape, at fortran/simplify.c:6857 since r6-4614-g57e596204fceef2e

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103260 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/103610] ICE in gfc_convert_mpz_to_signed, at fortran/simplify.c:193

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103610 --- Comment #8 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- *** Bug 103260 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug fortran/103610] ICE in gfc_convert_mpz_to_signed, at fortran/simplify.c:193

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103610 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/103412] [10/11/12 Regression] ICE: Invalid expression in gfc_element_size since r10-2083-g8dc63166e0b85954

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103412 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/103418] random_number() does not accept pointer, intent(in) array argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103418 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED

[Bug libfortran/103634] Runtime crash with PACK on zero-sized arrays

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103634 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/102332] ICE in select_type_set_tmp, at fortran/match.c:6366

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102332 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/103778] [10/11/12 Regression] ICE: Invalid expression in gfc_element_size

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103778 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED

[Bug fortran/102332] ICE in select_type_set_tmp, at fortran/match.c:6366

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102332 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |anlauf at gcc dot

[Bug fortran/103776] ICE in gfc_compare_string, at fortran/arith.c:1118

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103776 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED

[Bug fortran/101762] ICE with "Every subscript of the target specification must be a constant expression"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101762 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/77667] ICE in expand_call, at calls.c:2588

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77667 --- Comment #4 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to anlauf from comment #3) > The following patch seems to work: ... and regtests ok. It is not really pretty, though, and does not help with apparently related PRs, such as PR50410.

[Bug fortran/77667] ICE in expand_call, at calls.c:2588

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77667 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/103914] -fcheck=do seems not to work with omp parallel do construct

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103914 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement

[Bug fortran/103794] ICE in gfc_check_reshape, at fortran/check.c:4727

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103794 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-12-21

[Bug fortran/103789] ICE when providing kind argument to mask{l,r}

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103789 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/78054] gfortran.dg/pr70673.f90 FAILs at -O0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78054 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/103898] [12 Regression] ICE: gimplification failed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103898 --- Comment #5 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Started most likely with commit r12-3897 by Tobias. Interestingly, the ICE occurs only for a rank-1 array, but not for rank-2 or for assumed-rank.

[Bug fortran/101762] ICE with "Every subscript of the target specification must be a constant expression"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101762 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug fortran/101762] ICE with "Every subscript of the target specification must be a constant expression"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101762 --- Comment #4 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 52108 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52108=edit Improved patch The previous patch was too strict. The attached version does a much better job, but needs

[Bug fortran/103776] ICE in gfc_compare_string, at fortran/arith.c:1118

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103776 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW CC|

[Bug fortran/103778] [10/11/12 Regression] ICE: Invalid expression in gfc_element_size

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103778 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-12-20

[Bug fortran/103777] ICE in gfc_simplify_maskl, at fortran/simplify.c:4918

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103777 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/103412] [10/11/12 Regression] ICE: Invalid expression in gfc_element_size since r10-2083-g8dc63166e0b85954

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103412 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |anlauf at gcc dot

[Bug fortran/103776] ICE in gfc_compare_string, at fortran/arith.c:1118

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103776 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |anlauf at gcc dot

[Bug fortran/103778] [10/11/12 Regression] ICE: Invalid expression in gfc_element_size

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103778 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug fortran/103777] ICE in gfc_simplify_maskl, at fortran/simplify.c:4918

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103777 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug fortran/103777] ICE in gfc_simplify_maskl, at fortran/simplify.c:4918

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103777 --- Comment #3 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Minimal fix (for maskl): diff --git a/gcc/fortran/simplify.c b/gcc/fortran/simplify.c index 90067b6bbe6..45080e8b912 100644 --- a/gcc/fortran/simplify.c +++ b/gcc/fortran/simplify.c @@ -4909,6

[Bug fortran/103392] [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE in simplify_bound, at fortran/simplify.c:4273

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103392 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |anlauf at gcc dot

[Bug fortran/87711] ICE in gfc_trans_transfer, at fortran/trans-io.c:2676

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87711 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug fortran/103367] [10/11/12 Regression] ICE in gfc_conv_array_initializer, at fortran/trans-array.c:6377 since r12-4278-g74ccca380cde5e79

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103367 --- Comment #3 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- The 'real' index 'b' is a red herring. Replacing it e.g. by an undefined 'm' generates the same backtrace. Also replacing the bad code line by integer, parameter :: y(1,2) = (x(m)%a) !

[Bug fortran/103392] [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE in simplify_bound, at fortran/simplify.c:4273

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103392 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1

[Bug fortran/101329] ICE: Invalid expression in gfc_element_size

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101329 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED

[Bug fortran/87851] [9/10/11/12 Regression] Wrong return type for len_trim

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87851 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/87851] [9/10/11/12 Regression] Wrong return type for len_trim

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87851 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code ---

[Bug fortran/101329] ICE: Invalid expression in gfc_element_size

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101329 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug libfortran/95177] error: array subscript has type char

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95177 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug libfortran/95177] error: array subscript has type char

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95177 --- Comment #14 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Thomas Koenig from comment #13) > (In reply to anlauf from comment #12) > > > Any reason not to use the macros from safe-ctype.h? > > Can we actually use it? This is part of

[Bug fortran/96255] [F2018] Implement optional type spec for index in DO CONCURRENT

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96255 --- Comment #9 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to kargl from comment #8) > New patch. This adds a bool component to gfc_forall_iterator so > that an iterator with an index-name that shadows a variable from > outer scope can be

[Bug fortran/102368] Failure to compile program using the C_SIZEOF function in ISO_C_BINDING

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102368 --- Comment #2 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Testing the following patch: diff --git a/gcc/fortran/check.c b/gcc/fortran/check.c index ffa07b510cd..f325e5e4d5f 100644 --- a/gcc/fortran/check.c +++ b/gcc/fortran/check.c @@ -5272,13 +5272,18

[Bug fortran/102368] Failure to compile program using the C_SIZEOF function in ISO_C_BINDING

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102368 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/101919] Inconsistent -Wstringop-overread warning with -flto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101919 --- Comment #5 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to anlauf from comment #4) > This fixes comment#2: but "regresses" on gfortran.dg/transfer_intrinsic_1.f90 due to an additional MIN_EXPR. I haven't found the spot yet that needs to be

[Bug fortran/101919] Inconsistent -Wstringop-overread warning with -flto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101919 --- Comment #4 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- This fixes comment#2: diff --git a/gcc/fortran/trans-expr.c b/gcc/fortran/trans-expr.c index e7aec3845d3..f7e2a0dba57 100644 --- a/gcc/fortran/trans-expr.c +++ b/gcc/fortran/trans-expr.c @@

[Bug fortran/99061] [10/11/12 Regression] ICE in gfc_conv_intrinsic_atan2d, at fortran/trans-intrinsic.c:4728

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99061 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |anlauf at gcc dot

[Bug fortran/102817] [12 Regression] ICE in gfc_clear_shape, at fortran/expr.c:422 since r12-4278-g74ccca380cde5e79

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102817 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED

[Bug fortran/99348] ICE in resolve_structure_cons, at fortran/resolve.c:1286

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99348 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/102715] [12 Regression] ICE in gfc_simplify_transpose, at fortran/simplify.c:8184 since r12-4278-g74ccca380cde5e79

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102715 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED

[Bug fortran/102368] Failure to compile program using the C_SIZEOF function in ISO_C_BINDING

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102368 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING --- Comment #5 from

[Bug fortran/102685] [12 Regression] ICE in output_constructor_regular_field, at varasm.c:5514 since r12-4278-g74ccca380cde5e79

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102685 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/102816] [12 Regression] ICE in resolve_structure_cons, at fortran/resolve.c:1467 since r12-4452-g1e819bd95ebeefc1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102816 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/103263] ICE in gfc_check_reshape, at fortran/check.c:4830

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103263 --- Comment #3 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Likely a duplicate / variant of the old constructor bug for [array]. We have tons of these.

[Bug fortran/103286] ICE in resolve_select, at fortran/resolve.c:8848

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103286 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/103286] ICE in resolve_select, at fortran/resolve.c:8848

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103286 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/103263] ICE in gfc_check_reshape, at fortran/check.c:4830

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103263 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/103261] ICE in gfc_check_reshape, at fortran/check.c:4742

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103261 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/103418] random_number() does not accept pointer, intent(in) array argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103418 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1

[Bug fortran/87851] [9/10/11/12 Regression] Wrong return type for len_trim

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87851 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING --- Comment #18 from

[Bug fortran/103411] ICE in gfc_conv_array_initializer, at fortran/trans-array.c:6377

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103411 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/103418] random_number() does not accept pointer, intent(in) array argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103418 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/103411] ICE in gfc_conv_array_initializer, at fortran/trans-array.c:6377

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103411 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/103418] random_number() does not accept pointer, intent(in) array argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103418 --- Comment #10 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Steve Kargl from comment #9) > "does not work for me" isn't too descriptive. Well, you fixed a related issue, but not the problem in comment#0. Try your patch on: module m

[Bug fortran/59298] ICE when initialising PARAMETER array of derived-type (containing an array) using array constructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59298 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/84693] scalar DT not broadcast across an array in an initialization expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84693 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING CC|

[Bug fortran/102787] ICE in new test case gfortran.dg/reshape_shape_2.f90

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102787 --- Comment #8 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Simpler and better patch which handles array sections as well as vector subscripts: diff --git a/gcc/fortran/array.c b/gcc/fortran/array.c index 6552eaf3b0c..f870c225195 100644 ---

[Bug fortran/103392] [9/10/11 Regression] ICE in simplify_bound, at fortran/simplify.c:4273

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103392 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED

[Bug fortran/99061] [10/11/12 Regression] ICE in gfc_conv_intrinsic_atan2d, at fortran/trans-intrinsic.c:4728

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99061 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED

[Bug fortran/102521] ICE in gfc_conv_array_initializer, at fortran/trans-array.c:6240

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102521 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/102368] Failure to compile program using the C_SIZEOF function in ISO_C_BINDING

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102368 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |anlauf at gcc dot

[Bug fortran/102368] Failure to compile program using the C_SIZEOF function in ISO_C_BINDING

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102368 --- Comment #4 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Note: Steve Lionel of Intel thinks the code in comment#0 is invalid. But nvfortran, flang and crayftn all accept it without complaining. @Bill: any more detailed thoughts how to resolve this?

[Bug fortran/103418] random_number() does not accept pointer, intent(in) array argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103418 --- Comment #6 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Unfortunately the patch in comment#5 does not work for me. :-( Interestingly, the Intel compiler fails on the testcase, too.

[Bug fortran/103418] random_number() does not accept pointer, intent(in) array argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103418 --- Comment #4 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to kargl from comment #3) > (In reply to anlauf from comment #2) > > The nearly obvious fix: > > > > diff --git a/gcc/fortran/check.c b/gcc/fortran/check.c > > index

[Bug fortran/102817] [12 Regression] ICE in gfc_clear_shape, at fortran/expr.c:422 since r12-4278-g74ccca380cde5e79

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102817 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |anlauf at gcc dot

[Bug fortran/102817] [12 Regression] ICE in gfc_clear_shape, at fortran/expr.c:422 since r12-4278-g74ccca380cde5e79

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102817 --- Comment #5 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- I'm testing the following fix: diff --git a/gcc/fortran/expr.c b/gcc/fortran/expr.c index 4dea840e348..c5360dfaede 100644 --- a/gcc/fortran/expr.c +++ b/gcc/fortran/expr.c @@ -2129,6 +2129,7 @@

[Bug fortran/99853] ICE: Cannot convert 'LOGICAL(4)' to 'INTEGER(8)' (etc.)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99853 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >